--- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, Michael Hawkins <korgpolyex800@...> wrote: > > Well to be honest, I can hear 50mS when I line up two sounds in left and right. It's not easy but you can hear it. > Ok but a lot of people purposely introduce artificial lags in their sequences because it sounds more 'realistic', that's what functions called 'shuffle' and 'groove quantize' are supposed to do. I don't know how much those functions tend to offset though. I guess I should do some offset experimentation to see how off 50ms sounds. Oh well, I hope you do manage to tighten it up a little, I'm sure if you get it around 10 or 20ms that would be good enough. My master sequencer is often Beatpad running on a Palm Vx (because it unfortunately can't slave to clock), and it operates using the Palm's 10ms-accurate clock, giving a +/- of 5ms timing discrepency, and I've never noticed any problem with that, it sounds really tight. I never really understood why some people consider high ppqn rates in sequencers to be so desirable, either. Is a sequencer with 96ppqn resolution really going to sound any different than one with a 480ppqn resolution??
Message
Re: Lag in the HAWK-800
2010-02-25 by zoinky420