--- In exs-users@yahoogroups.com, "sleazyjoeblob" <azyte@b...> wrote:
> i'd use it far more if it was, d'you suppose theres some tech
reason for it not being so
> by now?
I've wondered the same but there are a couple things I think about.
There are not too many software synths I've seen that are multi-
timbral in the traditional sense. I think it's because you can run
multiple instances of the plugin and that is considered the software
world's way of saying something is multi-timbral. I can see this
being valid if the plugin is using the same amount of resource
whether its running 4 instances or using 4 parts within 1 instance.
The main difference being each user's computer would determine the
limitations of how many instances (or how "multi-timbral" it can be)
per machine.