--- Murray McDowall <murraymc@...> wrote: > I can't find any new info on MacRumours or ThinkSecret about whether they > have done anything about the lack of memory bandwidth There isnt a lack of bandwidth as such - as the cpu is one side of the controller the GFX, Disk and PCI subsytems can all access the memory at full bandwidth, so it isnt *that* much of an issue for most peoples purposes. This is still the case in the new machines though. > (although noise issues have been seen to). They have? This is something there is no mention of in the specs. I would assume it is no quieter until I hear otherwise from someone thats actually received one. > If this is so it would appear that the revised G4 with the bandwidth to > allow the PC 2700 DDR to earn its keep is still not available. It looks > like the L3 cache is all that is happening to speed memory access -- not > really an adequate solution for DAWs where you are running lots of > plugs simultaneously. Mmm. I'd disagree. As I mentioned, most memory bandwidth is used either GFX>mem or disk>mem. IIRC the CPU->Mem bandwidth in the MDD machines is approximately 150MB/s. To put that in context, a 24bit 96K stereo audio stream uses approx 0.56MB/s of bandwidth. Being pessimistic and assuming that 50% of the cpu->mem bandwidth is used up by GFX and IO device access, I dont think the lack of *extra* bandwidth is a serious constraint for most DAW users. If you personally find this to be an issue, I'd be interested to know what your average track setup is (track count, resolution, plugin use, live input use and hardware config) I think you're most likely to find you're constrained by lack of spare CPU cycles not bandwidth to memory! If you want to work out your bus usage, try having a play with GaugePro from : http://www.macgeneral.de/DownloadsHTML/GaugePro.html Best Wishes, Dave Peverley __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [exs] New Powermacs!
2003-01-28 by Pev
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.