You are saying that they would be paying more as "Free Advertising" simply by giving credit. on 1/11/03 11:59 AM, Eli Krantzberg at elik@... wrote: > Dan Chapman wrote: > >> The customers who end up using their products on commercial releases are in >> fact "making more" than those who don't. > > Hi Dan, > > Are you really advocating a sliding scale payment model. Because that's a > whole other can of worms. What about those (probably a signifigant percentage) > who don't end up using their legitimately purchased sample CDs on commercial > releases and don't make money from them? Should they then pay less? With your reasoning, they are paying less. on 1/11/03 4:08 AM, Eli Krantzberg at elik@... wrote: The customers > who end up using their products on commercial releases are in fact "paying > more" than those who don't. It's just that the additional payment isn't in > dollars (or euros), it's in providing advertisement for their products for > them with no renumeration.
Message
Re: [exs] Re: Majestic/Culture
2003-01-11 by Dan Chapman
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.