>I've worked with breath control. You're right. They are incredibly agile in >controlling data. You have reminded me how much I would like to get a really >good one. Can you imagine, when I take my industrial music on the road, >playing vicious leads from the EXS or ES2 though something that looks as >innocent as a flute? Sounds good to me... Jer > >> I know that the main reason the awesome Yamaha VL1 didn't sell was >> that you had to learn how to use a breath controller - which is >> (excuse me) way overblown, because it's so freaking easy - but isn't >> that really what we want samplers to do? It sure seems like a much >> less kludgey way to play a part. (I play the VL1 with an EWI, which > > is awesome combination.) > I use breath control wx5 and a vl70-m. It is expressive. The vl70-m only allows one voice, built as a lead instrument. sometimes I want a polyphonic module...but how many expressive vioces do you want to programme or orchestra, I ask myself?...and you? Incidentally there is the SYXG100 XG & VL PHYSICAL MODELING SOFTWARE SYNTh but only for windows. jp -- Tel: 01248 490 831 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [exs] Rate of change cc?
2003-01-11 by john plumridge
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.