EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group

Further more, if this were true, CDXtract and Translator would have been
sued into oblivion by now. I think this case is baseless, and Christian
should reconsider his position on the matter, or rather reverse his verbal
opinion. Nothing that originated from his company is traded with anyone. The
more I think about it, the more silly the argument seems to me. I don't
think you'd have a case in hell on this one my friend, much less on earth. I
don't usually write in such a cocky manner, but the more I've thought of it
(especially considering translation software availability) the more silly
the argument is. If you've been on this list for long, you know that EXS
patches created by list members (which in this case are never the property
of the sample owners) are traded all the time here provided they are not
exchanged with the samples attached. To quote Charlie Brown, "Good grief!"
-Jer

> I still can't see how building my own EXS patches from your samples would
> infringe any copyright or licence agreement.
> If you'd say people would not be allowed to use those samples in any sort of
> a commercial context, all OK with me.
> And of course redistribution isn't allowed at all.
> But I can't see how reusing those samples in anything else but your
> instrument would (or even could) infringe any laws. Just to imagine the
> worst case: I doubt you'd win any sort of lawsuit if someone would do so.