EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group

Gaggy . wrote:
> Wasn't here for long, so a delayed answer to the Win2K issue:

No problem ;-)

> I cannot believe that Emagic makes a professional sequener only for a really 
> non professional, very very unstable and annoying operating system (Win98) 

This depends. I am working for a value added reseller over here in Germany
and we hear _very_ different opinions on Windows 2000. Some have it running
fine, others have biiig problems with Win2K. Some even say it\ufffds much less
stable than Win98 (speaking of a clean, fresh install of course!).

Personally I don\ufffdt know how you come to the conclusion above: My Platinum
is performing great with Win98SE, crashes extremely seldom (probably less than
once a week due to very heavy usage sometimes _and_ despite using an AMD
processor).

> 5. Get The ZONE (Radium) version of LAP 4.6
>    and run it win Win2K without any
>    problems

HA-HA-HA :-))) Sorry that I laugh here, but _please_: You cannot be serious
about a crack performing better than the actual software!
Besides this, IMO this is not the forum to recommend or promote the usage of 
illegally cracked software.

> It's so sad, but that's the truth: Only the guys with the
> cracked version can use a "real" operating system
> together with LAP on a PC !

Urgh! "real" operating system? Win2K? After all the bugs reported?
Well, well, well - I don\ufffdt care if it\ufffds called Windows 3000 or
"Hypellium" or whatever _if_ it works. And Win98SE works like a charm
on my machine (and many others I know, too).

We\ufffdll wait on Service Pack 1 for Win2K and see...

> I think that can't be that illegal when
> you own the prog, isn't it ?

Ah, come on. You know _it is_ illegal, so why are you asking then?

Thomas