To add to this question (and by the way, thanks for your prior response), are all the pieces still mostly MIDI or are you dealing in audio only? The only reason I can fathom for this action is to have tempo control (if you're dealing with MIDI data) over transitions between tracks for some interesting crossfades... These, of course, are not criticisms but only curiosities. Yours is a very unusual approach. -Jer Also, Jam does a really good job with ID placement, although I really like WaveBurner for sound treatment. > From: david@... > Reply-To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com > Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 12:48:14 -0000 > To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [exs] Re: Non esx Question.... Please help > > --- In exs-users@y..., "Jess Jackson::" <JessJackson@L...> wrote: >> There are 22 tracks on the album but I have only gotten 18 on there > so far, >> its taken me all week up until now... But I was just about to add > another >> track into the arrangement, and I noticed that the song end position > was in >> the way, so I moved it further along and it wouldn¹t let me get more > than >> another 64 bars out of it.. So all I want is 74 mins and its only > giving me >> 1 hr 6 mins > > Sorry, I don't have a solution for you, but I do have a question for > you. WHY? Are you doing your production like this? Is it one 74 minute > song, with 22 tracks in the arrangement? I must be missing something > here. > > take care, > dfloyd > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > exs-users-unsubscribe@egroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [exs] Re: Non esx Question.... Please help
2001-09-10 by HELP@MusicProTools.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.