converting 1.2 volt/octave to 1 volt/octave
2011-07-19 by Nick

Yahoo Groups archive
Archive for emlsynth.
Index last updated: 2026-03-30 01:08 UTC
Thread
2011-07-19 by Nick
2011-07-19 by Prosper Prodaniuk
2011-07-19 by Nick Zampiello
While the concept of CV (Control Voltage) was fairly standard on analog synths, the implementation was not. For pitch control via CV, there are two prominent implementations:
The following example table demonstrates some notes and their corresponding voltage levels in both implementations (this example uses 1 V/octave and 55 Hz/V):
2011-07-19 by Prosper Prodaniuk
I know the difference i just had heard hz/v mentioned for them. A guy playing his with a MS-20 etc.
On 2011-07-19 12:15 PM, "Nick Zampiello" <newallianceeast@...> wrote:
The 200 and 101 oscillators are a non-standard 1.20v/octNEW ALLIANCE EAST!!!!
hz/volt is more of a japan convention: korg, Yamaha, etc...
i can get mine to tune to other 1v/oct gear but its prone to drift as the controls are so course.
i was hoping to get a mod enacted with a fine tune VR so one of the swing inputs was always 1v/oct and could be calibrated as things settle and drift...
PS:
from WIKI:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CV/Gate#CV
CVWhile the concept of CV (Control Voltage) was fairly standard on analog synths, the implementation was not. For pitch control via CV, there are two prominent implementations:
- Volts per octave. This standard was popularized by (if not created by) Bob Moog in the 1960s; it was widely adopted for control interfacing.One volt represents one octave, so the pitch produced by a voltage of 3 V would be one octave lower than that produced by a voltage of 4 V. Notable followers of this standard include Roland, Moog, Sequential Circuits, Oberheim and ARP.
- Hertz per volt. This method (used by most but not all Korg and Yamaha synths) represented an octave of pitch by doubling voltage, so the pitch represented by 2 V would be one octave lower than that represented by 4 V, and one higher than that represented by 1 V.
The following example table demonstrates some notes and their corresponding voltage levels in both implementations (this example uses 1 V/octave and 55 Hz/V):
z
--------------------------------------
http://www.newallianceeast.com
http://www.newallianceaudio.com
http://www.myspace.com/newallianceaudio
http://www.c4rt.com
www.myspace.com/thecampaignforrealtimeFrom: Prosper Prodaniuk <prosperp@...>
To: emlsynth@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, July 19, 2011 2:54:33 PM
Subject: [emlsynth] Re: converting 1.2 volt/octave to 1 volt/octave
Maybe in this someone can answer whether or not the 200 (and 100) are HZ/V as opposed to V/OCT a...
2011-07-19 by Nick Zampiello
I know the difference i just had heard hz/v mentioned for them. A guy playing his with a MS-20 etc.
On 2011-07-19 12:15 PM, "Nick Zampiello" <newallianceeast@...> wrote:
The 200 and 101 oscillators are a non-standard 1.20v/octNEW ALLIANCE EAST!!!!
hz/volt is more of a japan convention: korg, Yamaha, etc...
i can get mine to tune to other 1v/oct gear but its prone to drift as the controls are so course.
i was hoping to get a mod enacted with a fine tune VR so one of the swing inputs was always 1v/oct and could be calibrated as things settle and drift...
PS:
from WIKI:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CV/Gate#CV
CVWhile the concept of CV (Control Voltage) was fairly standard on analog synths, the implementation was not. For pitch control via CV, there are two prominent implementations:
- Volts per octave. This standard was popularized by (if not created by) Bob Moog in the 1960s; it was widely adopted for control interfacing.One volt represents one octave, so the pitch produced by a voltage of 3 V would be one octave lower than that produced by a voltage of 4 V. Notable followers of this standard include Roland, Moog, Sequential Circuits, Oberheim and ARP.
- Hertz per volt. This method (used by most but not all Korg and Yamaha synths) represented an octave of pitch by doubling voltage, so the pitch represented by 2 V would be one octave lower than that represented by 4 V, and one higher than that represented by 1 V.
The following example table demonstrates some notes and their corresponding voltage levels in both implementations (this example uses 1 V/octave and 55 Hz/V):
z
--------------------------------------
http://www.newallianceeast.com
http://www.newallianceaudio.com
http://www.myspace.com/newallianceaudio
http://www.c4rt.com
www.myspace.com/thecampaignforrealtimeFrom: Prosper Prodaniuk <prosperp@...>
To: emlsynth@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, July 19, 2011 2:54:33 PM
Subject: [emlsynth] Re: converting 1.2 volt/octave to 1 volt/octave
Maybe in this someone can answer whether or not the 200 (and 100) are HZ/V as opposed to V/OCT a...
2011-07-20 by sprgroups@o2.co.uk
> The 200 and 101 oscillators are a non-standard 1.20v/octAre you sure about the 200? The schematic I've seen looks
2011-07-20 by Nick Zampiello
> The 200 and 101 oscillators are a non-standard 1.20v/octAre you sure about the 200? The schematic I've seen looks
2011-07-21 by George Mattson
From: emlsynth@yahoogroups.com [mailto:emlsynth@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of sprgroups@...
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 3:45 PM
To: emlsynth@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [emlsynth] Re: converting 1.2 volt/octave to 1 volt/octave
> The 200 and 101 oscillators are a non-standard 1.20v/oct
Are you sure about the 200? The schematic I've seen looks
like a V/Hz oscillator. Or was there a later version of the 200
(201?)
Steve
2011-07-21 by Nick Zampiello
From: emlsynth@yahoogroups.com [mailto:emlsynth@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of sprgroups@...
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 3:45 PM
To: emlsynth@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [emlsynth] Re: converting 1.2 volt/octave to 1 volt/octave
> The 200 and 101 oscillators are a non-standard 1.20v/oct
Are you sure about the 200? The schematic I've seen looks
like a V/Hz oscillator. Or was there a later version of the 200
(201?)
Steve
2011-07-29 by rjeancarlo c
--- On Thu, 7/21/11, Nick Zampiello <newallianceeast@...> wrote:
From: Nick Zampiello <newallianceeast@...>
Subject: Re: [emlsynth] Re: converting 1.2 volt/octave to 1 volt/octave
To: emlsynth@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, July 21, 2011, 8:48 AM
So, i knew something was confusing and i looked into my old emails...
dave wilson of NESM had explained it to me before and i just remembered it backwards:
"The Museum is doing well. The VCOs on the 200 are Hz/Volt, not Oct/Volt, so they can be made totrack your Korg MS-20 or your Yamaha CS-40M, but not an ARP or Moog synthesizer. The EML 101has an output called "CM2" (Control Mode 2) that is a Hz/Volt output that can drive the 200's VCOs.Older EML 101s have a CM3, same thing but high note priority for duophonic; More recent 101s havea Sequencer input jack instead."
z
NEW ALLIANCE EAST!!!!
--------------------------------------
http://www.newallianceeast.com
http://www.newallianceaudio.com
http://www.myspace.com/newallianceaudio
http://www.c4rt.com
www.myspace.com/thecampaignforrealtime
From: George Mattson <axisair@...>
To: emlsynth@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, July 20, 2011 8:40:28 PM
Subject: RE: [emlsynth] Re: converting 1.2 volt/octave to 1 volt/octave
The 200 is basically just a bare integrator IC with a UJT, cap and diode network in the feedback loop. The center frequency and both swings are all summed together after their input resistors into the ame op amp input as the feedback network. The diode and UJT act as choppers to produce the sawtooth output from the integrator.The output of the op amp goes to the 470 ohm output impedance resistor and capacitively coupled to the two outputs, which are hardwired to each other.There's no current control, differentiation or exponential amplifier. So, it doesn't look like it was designed with any sort of scaling capacity in mind.
From: emlsynth@yahoogroups.com [mailto:emlsynth@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of sprgroups@...
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 3:45 PM
To: emlsynth@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [emlsynth] Re: converting 1.2 volt/octave to 1 volt/octave
> The 200 and 101 oscillators are a non-standard 1.20v/oct
Are you sure about the 200? The schematic I've seen looks
like a V/Hz oscillator. Or was there a later version of the 200
(201?)
Steve
2011-08-04 by Boddington
2011-09-26 by Rob
--- In emlsynth@yahoogroups.com, Nick Zampiello <newallianceeast@...> wrote:
>
> i never had any luck trying to get the EML to track to any hz/volt synth...
>
> it just can't scale that far beyond 1.2 v/oct...
>
> the way the controls are on mine it's almost impossible to keep it in tune
> scaled to 1v/oct with both osc in tune...
>
> maybe he was using the pitch tracker on the MS20 to make it chase the EML osc...
> the 'swing' on the ms20 pitch tracker can co from 0-2x or so i believe....
> maybe he tricked it into being in tune in a smaller range...
>
> hmmmmm.....
>
>
> z
>
> NEW ALLIANCE EAST!!!!
>
>
> --------------------------------------
>
> http://www.newallianceeast.com
>
> http://www.newallianceaudio.com
>
> http://www.myspace.com/newallianceaudio
>
> http://www.c4rt.com
>
> www.myspace.com/thecampaignforrealtime
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Prosper Prodaniuk <prosperp@...>
> To: emlsynth@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tue, July 19, 2011 3:17:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [emlsynth] Re: converting 1.2 volt/octave to 1 volt/octave
>
>
> I know the difference i just had heard hz/v mentioned for them. A guy playing
> his with a MS-20 etc.
> On 2011-07-19 12:15 PM, "Nick Zampiello" <newallianceeast@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >The 200 and 101 oscillators are a non-standard 1.20v/oct
> >
> >hz/volt is more of a japan convention: korg, Yamaha, etc...
> >
> >i can get mine to tune to other 1v/oct gear but its prone to drift as the
> >controls are so course.
> >
> >i was hoping to get a mod enacted with a fine tune VR so one of the swing inputs
> >was always 1v/oct and could be calibrated as things settle and drift...
> >
> >PS:
> >
> >from WIKI:
> >
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CV/Gate#CV
> >
> >CV
> >While the concept of CV (Control Voltage) was fairly standard on analog synths,
> >the implementation was not. For pitch control via CV, there are two prominent
> >implementations:
> > * Volts per octave. This standard was popularized by (if not created by) Bob
> >Moog in the 1960s; it was widely adopted for control interfacing.One volt
> >represents one octave, so the pitch produced by a voltage of 3 V would be one
> >octave lower than that produced by a voltage of 4 V. Notable followers of this
> >standard include Roland, Moog, Sequential Circuits, Oberheim and ARP.
> > * Hertz per volt. This method (used by most but not all Korg and Yamaha synths)
> >represented an octave of pitch by doubling voltage, so the pitch represented by
> >2 V would be one octave lower than that represented by 4 V, and one higher than
> >that represented by 1 V.
> >The following example table demonstrates some notes and their corresponding
> >voltage levels in both implementations (this example uses 1 V/octave and
> >55 Hz/V):
> >z
> >
> >
> > NEW ALLIANCE EAST!!!!
> >
> >
> >--------------------------------------
> >
> >http://www.newallianceeast.com
> >
> >http://www.newallianceaudio.com
> >
> >http://www.myspace.com/newallianceaudio
> >
> >http://www.c4rt.com
> >
> >www.myspace.com/thecampaignforrealtime
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ________________________________
> From: Prosper Prodaniuk <prosperp@...>
> >To: emlsynth@yahoogroups.com
> >Sent: Tue, July 19, 2011 2:54:33 PM
> >Subject: [emlsynth] Re: converting 1.2 volt/octave to 1 volt/octave
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Maybe in this someone can answer whether or not the 200 (and 100) are HZ/V as
> >opposed to V/OCT a...
>