eml synthesizers

I've had a number of people ask. So far this list has been fairly spam-
free. Posts to auction/sell/buy EML gear, parts and accessories are
acceptable. No other selling/trading to be done on this list. If you
are not sure, check with me first.


Thanks

Your host,

Mike B
digiboy@...

Mike,
Do you play out using your EML stuff in NYC? If so, where/when?

Thanks,
Rob Schwimmer

>Mike,
>
> Do you play out using your EML stuff in NYC? If so, where/when?
>
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>Rob Schwimmer

Hi Rob,

No , I'm a bass player and not much of a keyboard player. I experiment
with recording the EML stuff at home. Always wanted to put somekind of
performance/band together where I could but most of it is too delicate to
cart off to a gig anyway.

Mike Berman
digiboy@...

Hi,

We have an EML100 in very good condition. I'm in the midst of
trying to find any and all documentation for it including users
manuals/schematics/etc... Can anyone point me in the right
direction?

Thanks much,
Kurt Stallmann
Rice University

>Hi,
>
>
>
>We have an EML100 in very good condition. I'm in the midst of
>
>trying to find any and all documentation for it including users
>
>manuals/schematics/etc... Can anyone point me in the right
>
>direction?
>
>
>
>Thanks much,
>
>Kurt Stallmann

The model 100 is extremely rare. It was only on the market for s short time
and then was updated to the 101 which was EML's most succesful model.
Unfortunately it's very difficult to come by any useful information about
the 100. I only recently managed to get a picture of one (it's in the
photo archive for anyone curious). The image isn't perfectly sharp but you
can see that it very closely resembles the 101 in control layout. The only
obvious difference is that there is no control knob on the 100 where the
sampler control is on a 101. That probably means it doesn't have a
sampler...probably...but you would know better than me. If you like, you
could send me some detailed photos of the control planel and I might be
able to deduce a bit more. More photos of a 100 for the archive would be
great.

It's a pretty safe bet that the 100 operates basically the same as a 101but
is probably missing 1 or more features that they added to the 101. I
don't think it has anything unique that the 101 doesn't have... but you'd
really have to set the two models up side by side to be sure. Mark Vail's
book mentions that the VCO's on the100 are able to generate interesting
accurate waveforms from an "engineering" standpoint but the 101 is better
geared for generating musically interesting sounds.

Regardless of that, I have no doubt the 100 would be a lot of fun to mess
around with, as is the 101.

I wish I could offer you some more info leads but there just isn't much
around.

If anyone else would like to add more or can suggest a good
source...please step up and help out!

Thanks!

regards,

Mike B





Mike Berman
digiboy@...

Kurt,
Your Yahoo address isn't working.
I tried to send this to youand it bounced.
See below:

>Dear Mike,
>
>I got a reference to you from Mark Glinsky at Manual Manor. I'm
>looking for any and all documentation on the EML100. Do you
>have/know of any? We have a unit in very good/usable condition
>at Rice U. If you'd like a pic, I could send you one. Thanks for
>any info you can offer.
>
>Best regards,
>Kurt Stallmann
>Rice University

Hi Kurt,
I just responded on the EML list.
About the only other thing i can think of is that getting a manual for the
101 (which should be easier to do than getting one for the 100) might be
somewhat useful in figuring out the 100. I have no paperwork on the 100.
Yes, any and all photos of a 100 would be appreciated. I might be able to
make a copy of the 101 manual but it would be while, couple weeks at least.

regards,

Mike B


----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<huseac@...>
(reason: 554 delivery error: dd Sorry your message to huseac@...
cannot be delivered. This account has been disabled or discontinued [#102].
- mta417.mail.yahoo.com)

----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to mx2.mail.yahoo.com.:

>>> DATA

<<< 554 delivery error: dd Sorry your message to huseac@... cannot be
delivered. This account has been disabled or discontinued [#102]. -
mta417.mail.yahoo.com
554 5.0.0 Service unavailable

Reporting-MTA: dns; nycsmtp3out.rdc-nyc.rr.com
Received-From-MTA: DNS; 66-108-107-188.nyc.rr.com
Arrival-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 21:27:37 -0400 (EDT)

Final-Recipient: RFC822; huseac@...
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: DNS; mx2.mail.yahoo.com
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 delivery error: dd Sorry your message to
huseac@... cannot be delivered. This account has been disabled or
discontinued [#102]. - mta417.mail.yahoo.com
Last-Attempt-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 21:27:43 -0400 (EDT)

Received: from [66.108.107.188] (66-108-107-188.nyc.rr.com [66.108.107.188])
by nycsmtp3out.rdc-nyc.rr.com (8.12.1/Road Runner SMTP Server 1.0)
with ESMTP id g7Q1RagR027746
for <huseac@...>; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 21:27:37 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sender: digiboy@...
Message-Id: <l03130301b98f35cfb665@[66.108.107.188]>
In-Reply-To: <akbs9k+rnaa@...>
References: <l03130300b97eb8ba235b@[66.108.107.188]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 21:37:55 -0400
To: "huseac" <huseac@...>
From: "Mike B (digiboy)" <digiboy@...>
Subject: Re: EML 100

Mike Berman
digiboy@...