For me, the role that the EMS500 played in the Devo Sound was enough for me. EMS synths are a whole different experience. They are wonderfully made and you can see where the money is. But, there is a reason why you don't hear many lead lines on PF albums until the late seventies. Keeping a EMS in tune AND intonated is the hardest of any analog synth I have ever used. Moogs, Arps and OB FVS are all much easier to use. They are great for sound effects and as a filter processor, but they are a real challenge as a lead instrument. My hats off to Eno, Rundgren and others, but only with a Kenton Midi to CV controller have I been able to use my VCS3 MKI melodically. --- In emlsynth@yahoogroups.com, "nicholas_kent" <nicholas_kent@y...> wrote: > > > > > > >While it's possible to drive samples somehow, it's incredibly > > >improbable someone would use a Control Voltage based > > >sequencer to conntrol samples. Let alone risk doing so > reliably > > >in a live context. > > > > > >Also wouldn't you think EML would have used the fact PF > used > > >their gear for their marketing somewhere sometime if it was > > >used on any kind of regular basis? > > > > > >There just has to be more of a mistake than just the sampling > > >one. Like that gear belongs to an openning act, or someone > > >thought that pic was cool, kept it and then years later guessed > > >it came from a PF gig. > > > > > > > > > I was just trying to conjure up some idea of a way the > sequencer could > > conceivably be used in conjunction with samples. But it's really > of another > > era, there would be better ways. Have to doubt that caption. > > Yes, it's something an experimenter might think about, it's not > beyond possibility but really no one does that sort of thing on a > commercial tour. > > > > > I'm skeptical that PF ever used that gear, but I wouldn't be > surprized to > > learn that they did , Even if they just tried it out. I seem to recall > > reading that Frank Zappa played around with a 101 too but the > company never > > capitalized on that either. (Altho my recollection is that Zappa > wasn't > > very complimentary of it....) > > Well thats sort off why. Also now that I think about it if someone > on the artist's side thinks it looks like an endorsement they might > demand something in return. On the other hand if someone > uses visible gear live word does get out. > > Which of course brings up that for example Zappa was a well > known Emu user . EMS use is well documented in the 70s. (Pink > Floyd, Eno, Schulze, Jarre, etc.). > > What other pre-1990s users of EML were there who are well > documented ? The only ones I ever hear are Pere Ubu and Devo. > Why, if it's true that it wasn't known PF were using them before > that site.
Message
Re: Pink Floyd synths
2004-03-18 by widoworx
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.