my 101 is serial number 280. the layout of the oscillator boards is the
same, but the VCA (i think it's board #2) is completely different from that
in the calibration instructions. somebody suggested maybe that board would
be the same as a 100, which i think is quite possible.
----->luther
on 9/1/02 6*10 AM, emlsynth@yahoogroups.com at emlsynth@yahoogroups.com
wrote:
same, but the VCA (i think it's board #2) is completely different from that
in the calibration instructions. somebody suggested maybe that board would
be the same as a 100, which i think is quite possible.
----->luther
on 9/1/02 6*10 AM, emlsynth@yahoogroups.com at emlsynth@yahoogroups.com
wrote:
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 18:26:22 -0400
> From: "mm123 ah" <mm123ah@...>
> Subject: re: 4 new pdf files / serial # skipping
>
> Dear Mike,
>
> Thanks for the uploads, I am sure the calibration procedure will be very
> helpful to many of us! FYI, I have seen several EML101s in my time but I
> dont recall any of them being below serial number 400. The letter you
> posted shows a unit with a number lower than 300 but I wonder how many of
> these actually exist. I believe EML used to skip numbers intentionally and
> doubt they started at SN 1. Does anyone else here have a unit below SN 300?
> I am also curious to know the range of serial numbers of the other EML
> products as I suspect the same number skipping is true with other models.
>
> Mini