so the non-USB port didn't work? That link I sent the other week was to a 422 adapter card that was able to run synchronous.... is the issue that this card can only be clock master, or something??? PS, you do NOT need a digital storage oscilloscope. A logic analyser will tell you way more here. esynthesist wrote: >Thanks Tristan. > >I'm wondering though: even if we find the actual cause of the problem >(timing or signal level), I guess there's not much we can do to solve >the problem. Besides making a custom communication board of course. >Because I don't think characteristics such as "clock to data >relationship" can be configured on any normal commercial RS422 port >device for PCs, right ? >That's in fact the only reason why I didn't invest in a scope yet: >exactly knowing the problem would be nice, but not being able to >solve it would be frustrating :-) >Man ! I would love the standard PC RS422 ports to be externally >clockable ! Why is this (once again) one of those "Mac"-only >features ! > >Question: the RS422 communication "timeout period" on the Emax can be >configured with a SYSEX command (from 1 to 127 seconds). But I guess >this is not something that can help on the lowel level data >syncronization problem we are dealing with here, right ? I >guess "our" problem is more related to the speed at which a stream of >bits (as a whole) is entering the Emax port ? > >///E-Synthesist > > > > > >
Message
Re: [emax] Re: RS422 fun
2008-11-21 by mr julian
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.