Emax

about the previous message -
i thought truncation and ending based on level
are one and the same thing  




Now Im really wondering about the feasibility of adding things such as these to the EmaxII (and other similar devices in general..) by software upgrade/hacking : 

~ start/stop force sampling by footswitch
~ post sample threshold cutoff/envelope option (so it stops recording after the sound is over when recording ..)
~ change of default sample placement ratio settings ...   
~ portamento capability 

~ (and even , more advanced , if possible - threshold  multi sampling     - for taking a bunch of samples in a row and having them be automatically placed as separate samples (based on the simple setable placement ratio), divided by the below-threshold spaces/silence between)


{OS hack/upgrade example idea ...      when in Sample mode have footswitch 1  =  #7  button press (force sampling) , and footswitch 2  =  #8  button press (end sampling)  }
{ it already can recognize thresholds, and trigger sampling by it ... so why not  post sample..??     )
{default re-write or just have it remember your last sample placement parameters and continue on from there to next (instead of resetting to the single default ratio every freaken time) }



maybe Im just dumb or something , but 
I am baffled and frustrated that a sampler (and so many other devices, including very recent ones Ive used ) with so many other seemingly complex features and tedious editing capabilitys and additions does not have these simple (much more) vital and timesaving/(intuition/inspiration preserving[fostering/supporting]) realtime features   (or at least the flexability so that the user could make the features)          damn damn damn   I say ...   ;p

Did they not think of it ??  how could they have not thought of it?
its this kind of thing that starts making me really think that all reality is my own karmic nightmare or something
its bizzarre like that  like a dream (which seem to abound in ridiculous things of this nature) , like some kind of a joke,  for real..   :)

maybe I shouldnt have wrote that..





--

On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 17:38:30    John Joseph Silveria II wrote:
>From: "John Joseph Silveria II" <emaxjs@...>
>
>> >Nope, even newer samples simply auto-truncate as opposed to ending 
>> >based on a level.
>> >
>> why is that  ..  whats the difference ?
>
>You got me. I'm sure it's something they could do, but it seems kind of 
>frivilous when you've got a machine that you can't set the maximum 
>time to sample and then have it clean up the end anyways.
>
>
>**********************************************************
>          John Silveria II   AIM/AOL - Emax JS
>
>Emax and Emax II User's Group - http://www.silveriafamily.com
>Emax and Emax II Mailing List - emax@onelist.com
>**********************************************************
>
>>Emax and Emax II User's Group
>
>http://www.ncal.verio.com/~qsite/emax
>


--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.