Elektron Musical Instruments

You have great ideas here.  I agree more machines would be great.  I 
haven't seen elvis and don't care to.  In b)you mean like a note 
record function?  I wanted this but for got about it.  Real 
parameters would be much better.  909 hh would be nice too, along 
with about 4 other new machines, but not just one.

--- In elektron-users@yahoogroups.com, "basvandewerk <Bazziman@h...>" 
<Bazziman@h...> wrote:
> Well, it seems some of the current users couldn't give a rats arse 
> about there being a 909 hat sample in the thing or not. Others 
(like 
> myself) have tried to recreate the sound, with some succes. Still, 
I 
> can't see why a few extra machines would be something to object to.
> (these would NOT cost extraDSP, the number of simultanious machines 
> would still be 16, they would cost some memory, but Elektron could 
> kill that elvis for sure)
> 
> The MD would even be more of a joy to use for me (and a lot of 
> potential buyers). It would suck if these (and many other) 
> improvements would be abailable in the MD mkII and not in the MD 
> v.1.2... I honestly don't understand people who might object to 
> extra functionalities that Elektron *might* provide...I sure as 
hell 
> was *Ver* happy when novation gave me the extra filters and 
> oscillator models for my Nova when they realesed their OS4. Not 
that 
> I didn't like my 3.1 Nova...on the contrary! 
> 
> Why don't we get a whishlist going? (we are already, aren't we?) 
> Maybe someone from Elektron will pick some of our ideas up.
> 
> ps. here's a few extra ideas: 
> 
> a) Show real parameter values (ms, hz etc) instead of 0-127 when 
> turning knobs. 
> 
> b) Make lock settings easier to copy from one grid postition to 
> another...(so I can program only one 16th note and copy the 
settings 
> of that note to every 2nd 16th note...)
> 
> c) Give my those 909 hats. With 8 parameters!