Elektron Musical Instruments

Hi Scott - thanks for the reply and the testing.

Give or take the odd sample - your MD tests are almost identical to
mine which is good and bad if you get my drift!

The RS I thought would do better so I'm glad I never bought one!

The MC-80EX is a surprise - I never tested tempo stability but they
all have Zip/Hard Drive Buffer/Midi Jam problems that were never
resolved so it always got the boat anchor in my book - shame really.

As far as VSTis and Computers go - I use them for word processing and
maybe a bit of 2 track editing. Oh and a paperweight now and again too!

Unless you work all under the hood of a computer which I refuse to do
because the real world is much more fun - sync/timing via crap
USB/Midi/Sloppy Windows drivers etc just doesn't cut it next to tight
hardware so I doubt I will get around to plug-ins.

Thanks again for the test and the interest Scott.

All the very best.

David
www.innerclocksystems.com

> Following your testing method, here's the first 8 quarter notes'
spacing data from my hardware sequencers.  I used a single track of
hard-quantized uniform velocity and gated rim-shot samples.  Do my
thoughts/comments make sense to you?
> 
> Elektron MD SPS-1 UW OS v1.33 
> 22112 22017 22048 22113 22016 22049 22016 22113
> max. differential: 95 samples
> comments: somewhat uniform long/short variation pattern with a
period of roughly every 1/2-2/3 measure
> 
> Korg EMX-1 latest OS
> 22001 22000 22100 21998 22100 22000 22100 22000
> max. differential: 102 samples
> comments: after the first two notes, the variation becomes uniform
(i.e tight relative to its own timebase)
> 
> RS7000 latest OS
> 22051 22047 22050 22114 21984 22047 22050 22120
> max. differential: 130 samples
> comments: has a different short/long pattern with a period of
roughly 1 measure
> 
> Roland MC-80 EX OS version unknown 
> 21998 22060 22059 22070 22047 22060 22065 22069
> max. differential: 62 samples
> comments: after the first two notes, the variation minimizes
resolves to a similar pattern as the RS7000, but with a much smaller
variation magnitude of 23 samples (i.e tighter)
> 
> Conclusion: the MC-80 EX is the tightest of my hardware sequencers.
 So, does anyone want to buy it?  ;-)
> 
> It's ironic that the most fun and interactive of these sequencing
devices (MD and EMX) have the most clock variation from ideal, whereas
the most structured and rigid box (MC-80 EX) is the "tightest". 
Coincidence?
> 
> Finally - have you done any measurements of software VSTi hosts
playing the quarter-note pattern in one computer, and using another
computer to record the host's audio output?  Of course there are many
more variables in SW, such as audio interface latency, the VSTi
plug-in itself, the host, the OS, etc... but that's SW for you.  It
would be interesting to see how SW stacks up against HW...
> 
> I have a feeling you might experience different results with
rendered audio tracks within the host as opposed to recording the
audio output on another computer/device.  My guess is that rendering
would yield a more accurate output than a recording of the audio
output.  Do you agree?
> 
> Thanks,
> Scott
>  
> 
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: innerclock2004 
>   To: elektron-users@yahoogroups.com 
>   Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 3:42 AM
>   Subject: [elektron] MD SPS-1 Timing Performance Issues
> 
> 
>   Hi all - there is an interesting topic/thread regarding timing 
>   stability of the MD SPS-1 at the Elektron Users Forum if anyone feels 
>   like taking a look while the thread and interest is active.
> 
>   http://www.elektron-users.com/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?
>   topic_id=2155&viewmode=flat&order=ASC&start=0
> 
>   All the best - David
>   www.innerclocksystems.com
> 
> 
> 
>    
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>