Yahoo Groups archive

Datacolor User to User Support Group.

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:18 UTC

Message

Re: Reasons to upgrade from Spyder2Pro to Spyder3Pro?

2008-09-14 by prof_mgt551

Thanks for sharing your experience with the Spyder3Pro. When you say
that it has improved your calibrations, do you mean in reference to
Spyder2Pro? Also, do you mean it has improved the quality of the
displayed image? In what way? For example, smoother gray scale
gradients than with Spyder2Pro? If you make prints, do you get a
better print to screen match?

--- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, "PJS" <psandham@...> wrote:
>
> I've been very happy with the new Spyder. Having used
Colorvision/Datacolor
> since the beginning, each product upgrade seems to improve my
calibrations.
> It is faster, has continuous ambient light monitoring, and offers
settings
> not available with the model 2. For me - it was well worth the
upgrade ~~
> and no, I do not have any affiliation with the company.
> 
> pjs
> "Computer photography won't be photography as we know it.
> I think photography will always be chemical."
> Annie Leibovitz
> 
> no hablo mac :-)
> ------------------original message (or parts thereof)-----------------
> From: prof_mgt551
> Subject: [colorvision_group] Reasons to upgrade from Spyder2Pro to
> Spyder3Pro?
> >>>will I see a noticeable improvement in my monitor calibration and
> monitor profile?<<<
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.