Datacolor User to User Support Group.

Please read my previous note about rendering intents NOT applying to  
nonprint profiles.

C. D. Tobie
WW Product Technology Mngr.
Digital Imaging & Home Theater
DataColor.com
CDTobie@...

On Aug 14, 2008, at 4:32 PM, "Antonio Bayma Jr"  
<abaymajr@...> wrote:

> What led me to this conclusion was direct  comparison between prints  
> of a given image made by an intent-controllable application  
> (Photoshop and ACDSee) and any other non-color managed application  
> (Word, Internet Explorer, Canon CD-Label Print, and, of course,  
> Photoshop and ACDSee with their color management settings disabled).  
> This is very the same result with Windows XP. Anyway, I suspect both  
> Windows XP and Vista ICM engines (which seem to be the same in  
> essence) have rendering intent control built-in their codes, because  
> some applications (like ACDSee) that don't have their own color  
> management engine, relying on XP/Vista color engine for that  
> purpose, but still have control of what rendering intent to  
> "borrow", are able to change the output rendering (from perceptual  
> to saturation).
>
> Now it comes another question: if Vista color management can't  
> select by itself other than perceptual intent for ICC/ICM printing  
> profiles, what to expect for monitor ones? I'm not sure but suspect  
> they are also treated for perceptual intent. If so, it shouldn't  
> hurt so much, since monitor gamuts are usually larger enough to  
> accomodate most real-world image data.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: LAURIE
> To: colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 1:26 AM
> Subject: RE: [colorvision_group] High quality target for CD/DVD  
> printing
>
> >Windows Vista color management only considers perceptual rendering,  
> despite of all kind of settings combinations I have tried on >color  
> management panel.
>
>
>
> I am not sure what has led you to this conclusion.  I opened up the  
> Color Management item in the Vista Control panel and saw that while  
> perceptual was the default rendering other rendering intents were  
> available options.
>
>
>
>