In a message dated 7/13/2008 3:23:32 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, laurie@... writes: I would be interested in hearing if what I am about to suggest is wrong or if there is a way to achieve a printed output that has the same punch and vibrance as the monitor display. However, in the meantime, I will suggest that monitor displays are transmissive presentations while printed outputs are reflective. This may account for the dulling down of the appearance between the monitor display and the printed output. I would also suggest that, while the soft proof display - which is also a transmissive output - may be punchier than the actual printed output, it is probably slightly duller and less punchy than the working space preview or standard desktop versions of the image display to replicate what the printed output might be – i.e., to take into account dulling down of reflective outputs. Laurie: It's not just "dulling down"; you will often have colors or tones that are un-printable.... out of gamut. Oftentimes, snappy, brilliant colors fall into this category, so what you get is duller, more muted colors. The color space you're working in has a lot to do with the final result on paper. Assuming your profiles are accurate, you have to do tests to determine the limits of your printer/paper/inkset combinations to reproduce your images to an acceptable degree. HTH, Richard Massie **************Get the scoop on last night's hottest shows and the live music scene in your area - Check out TourTracker.com! (http://www.tourtracker.com?NCID=aolmus00050000000112)
Message
Re: [colorvision_group] PerpetualVisions Review/Faded preview, print
2008-07-14 by CorrPro96@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.