I always expect soft proofs to look 'faded', since it's an attempt to show what the print will look like. Prints -always- look different, the nearest I can get is with a print in a matched viewing cabinet/stand and setting everything up quite carefully (inc. room lighting) I get so many people ask about this when I've been giving talks about printing and colour management that I even wrote an article "Why don't my prints match my screen" :-) http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/article_pages/match_prints_to_screen.html I find that once I let go of thinking of the image on the screen as anything other than an intermediate stage in getting to a print, I worry far less about the perceived mismatches. I have the equipment to get very good soft proofing, and still only use it for giving me an idea of what my prints are going to look like. The moment I take one out of the viewing box and hang it in normal room lighting, it will look different anyway :-) Take time producing a set of prints of the Datacolor test image with different profile settings and papers and get a feel for how prints look - this is far more important (IMHO) than chasing after (an illusory) precision in soft proofing... bye for now Keith Cooper
Message
Re: PerpetualVisions Review/Faded preview, print
2008-07-13 by Keith Cooper
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.