Yahoo Groups archive

Datacolor User to User Support Group.

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:18 UTC

Message

RE: [colorvision_group] Problem printing neutral B&W

2008-02-04 by Tom Moore

Sorry, I hate it when people ask questions and don't give enough info to
answer them.

 

I'm using an Epson 2200 with MIS Pro color inks on Premier Fine Art 270
paper. I know I had previously asked a question about mottling on this
paper. That now seems to be the result of bad (or mis-labelled) batch of the
paper. I have had no problems with making a color profile for this paper
with my recent box. The problem I'm having now is with achieving neutral
grays in the highlights with the profile I created with the Extended Grays
target. I've included a plot of my measurements of a 21 step wedge (although
I'm not sure Yahoo will let me post it to the list). From the chart you can
see that the a* and b* are more or less within 1 point of neutral (right Y
axis) down to about 40%K and then start to separate. Visually, the steps
from 30% down to 5% are the most noticeably pinkish blue.

 

A similar plot using the profile made without the extended grays shows a
wider variation of a*and b* from neutral and thus the benefit of using the
extended grays. However, the extended grays profile does not have as linear
plot of L*

 

Tom Moore

 



 

 

  _____  

From: colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of CDTobie@...
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 11:58 AM
To: colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [colorvision_group] Problem printing neutral B&W

 


In a message dated 2/1/08 1:01:12 AM, rtmlists8888@... writes:





So my question is: has anyone made a profile that has been able to produce
good neutral black and white images?



Many. On a good printer/paper/ink combination, the entire ramp is less than
one a*/b* point from zero. Since you never mention what printer, inks, or
media you are using, its difficult to respond with suggestions.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.