>David Miller, > >I am aware that you print targets out "Same As Source" without a profile and that is what >we have been doing with all our many tests. > >If you followed the earlier correspondence, I had written: > >"Should there be such a differemce between the generic Museo profile provided by Crane >and the one I am making?" > >C. David had suggested that: > >"To check the printed gamut, open the 225 patch single page target from the PFP Targets >folder, assign your workingspace, to it, and print to the Crane profile. That will show you >what max colors the Crane profile can manage. Do the same with the PFP profile, and >check the primary patches in that. If Crane is getting colors beyond PFP's, then there is >definitely something amiss." > >Trying the exercise C. David had suggested yielded results not quite similar. Somewhat >similar gamuts but different patches printed quite differently. The canned Crane profile >was made with THEIR 9800. I am still trying to figure whether we have an erradic 9800. Sorry about that! You're right, I had missed the earlier post; and I didn't mean my response to sound harsh, I just wanted to point out the proper use of targets. (From time to time, this issue has come up here on the list as well as in other Internet forums). >It's quite a learning curve to get the best possible. I know exactly what you mean...:-) Best regards, -- David Miller Senior Software Developer, Digital Color Solutions ColorVision
Message
[colorvision_group] Re: Profiling 9800 problems
2006-06-07 by David Miller
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.