Yahoo Groups archive

Cgs synth

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:16 UTC

Thread

Re: SuCcess! (Was: bi-n-tic filter...help!)

Re: SuCcess! (Was: bi-n-tic filter...help!)

2007-04-14 by Peng

>> Although, afaik, a TL072, unlike
>> the LM358, doesn't like going to rails. I'm not sure about positive
>> outputs, but the common mode voltage getting too close to the
>> negative rail of a TL072 can cause phase inversion and latch up. I
>> apologize if I sound overly critical, but for educational purposes,
>> I'm not sure why another comparator circuit was not used.

> Maybe the 358 would be better. I just had 072s, and they've worked on
> around 10 Bintics I've built.


When I built my Gate Sequencer I had problems using the LM358 as a
comparator. I think the transition time may be too slow. Instead of a
sharp trigger/pulse, there was a ramping up. This caused the CMOS chip
trigger/count to be very jumpy.


peng

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Re: SuCcess! (Was: bi-n-tic filter...help!)

2007-04-15 by sasami@hotkey.net.au

> When I built my Gate Sequencer I had problems using the LM358 as a
>comparator. I think the transition time may be too slow. Instead of a
>sharp trigger/pulse, there was a ramping up. This caused the CMOS chip
>trigger/count to be very jumpy.

LM358 are all over the place with regards to specs. Initially I was using a
very good batch when designing with them. Later I got a poor batch, realised
the problems and phased them out. For single rail supplies, perhaps the
MC34072 would do the trick if a TL072 won't.

Ken
_______________________________________________________________________
Ken Stone sasami@...
Modular Synth PCBs for sale <http://www.cgs.synth.net/>
Australian Miniature Horses & Ponies <http://www.blaze.net.au/~sasami/>

Re: SuCcess! (Was: bi-n-tic filter...help!)

2007-04-15 by Jason Proctor

LT1013 is another good fast rail-safe opamp. MOTM standard for CV
processing etc.

hth
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>LM358 are all over the place with regards to specs. Initially I was using a
>very good batch when designing with them. Later I got a poor batch, realised
>the problems and phased them out. For single rail supplies, perhaps the
>MC34072 would do the trick if a TL072 won't.
>
>Ken

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.