Yahoo Groups archive

Cgs synth

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:16 UTC

Message

Re: Stero version of CGS 202 resonant eq

2013-06-26 by cg_synth

Looks very nice!

Ken

>
>Well, i built it and for anyone interested i put i pic up in the photo's
section.http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cgs_synth/photos/album/1538675616/pic/
1794994871/view?picmode=&mode=tn&order=ordinal&start=1&count=20&dir=asc
>
>Thanks so much Ken 1) for doing these boards and 2) for your suggestion of
doing 2 separate controls for each band,you can create some really cool
imaging in the stereo field.
>
>
>--- In cgs_synth@yahoogroups.com, Loscha <loscha@...> wrote:
>>
>> If you wired up the two resistive elements across, say, a 9v battery,
>> and then hooked each of the sweeping legs across both channels of a
>> scope, you'd get a pretty accurate measurement of the two tapers.
>>
>> /ErJ
>>
>> On 4/2/13, adematteo <adematteo@...> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Individual control over left and right may be the most economical way to go
>> > but i think i will order a hand full and do as you suggest to see just how
>> > off they are.
>> >
>> > Thanks Ken, all food for thought.
>> >
>> > --- In cgs_synth@yahoogroups.com, sasami@ wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thoughts:
>> >>
>> >> You could make some "switched attenuators" instead of using pots -
>> >> basically
>> >> dual gang rotary switches with 1% resistors between each step. That of
>> >> course gets very expensive.
>> >>
>> >> You could buy a few pots and test them, and see how bad they really are.
>> >> Maybe you can pic the best.
>> >>
>> >> Maybe it would be better if each channel could be adjusted individually
>> >> anyway.
>> >>
>> >> Ken
>> >>
>> >> >Hey guys, I would like to build a stereo version of the res. eq.
>> >> >The idea would be to build a desktop box that i can run my master bus
>> >> > from
>> >> my mixer through.
>> >> >
>> >> >I was wondering if anyone could offer any practical advice as far as
>> >> getting close to the same response from both boards ?
>> >> >
>> >> >At first thought i was going to use dual gang pots but then have read
>> >> > the
>> >> tolerances between the 2 sections can be 10-20 % different.
>> >> >Do you guys know of any other affordable solutions ?
>> >> >
>> >> >I assumed to match all the caps in the filter sections.Other than that
>> >> > and
>> >> the pots i figured this should be doable for a reasonable cost but maybe
>> >> i'm
>> >> dreaming ?
>> >> >
>> >> >Thanks for any insight you guys can share.
>> >> >
>> >> >-Tony
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >------------------------------------
>> >> >
>> >> >The CGS Modular Synth home page: http://www.cgs.synth.net/
>> >> >Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> Ken Stone sasami@ otherunicorn@
>> >> Modular Synth PCBs for sale <http://www.cgs.synth.net/>
>> >> Australian Miniature Horses & Ponies <http://www.blaze.net.au/~sasami/>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> www.loscha.com
>>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>The CGS Modular Synth home page: http://www.cgs.synth.net/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________
Ken Stone sasami@... otherunicorn@...
Modular Synth PCBs for sale <http://www.cgs.synth.net/>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.