Yahoo Groups archive

Analogue-sequencer

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:15 UTC

Thread

CVIO option overkill for one mono synth? Opinions?

CVIO option overkill for one mono synth? Opinions?

2011-07-08 by John

I've five midi synths and one CV/Gate mono SH101 and just wondering if the Cirklon CVIO option would be overkill.... and an expensive way of sequencing just that one synth via this method? I may add another mono at a much later date, but that's only 50/50 chance.

Also the CV breakout box seems to be massive with loads of CV sockets etc which just won't be used in my set-up...

Any opinions please?

Thanks,

John

RE: [analogue-sequencer] CVIO option overkill for one mono synth? Opinions?

2011-07-08 by James R. Coplin

A Kenton Pro Solo new is 116ukp and the upcharge on the Cirklon is 200ukp.
They are a little different but it seems the price differential is close
enough to make the CVIO option reasonable and if you get a modular rig or
some other monosynth in the future you are already hooked up.  I suppose it
depends on if the 84ukp savings is worth the integration by having another
piece or if the savings of 200ukp is worth not using your monosynth with the
Cirklon - which seems a bit of a waste but perhaps not depending on your
music.

 

James R. Coplin
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 6:37 AM
To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [analogue-sequencer] CVIO option overkill for one mono synth?
Opinions?

 

  

I've five midi synths and one CV/Gate mono SH101 and just wondering if the
Cirklon CVIO option would be overkill.... and an expensive way of sequencing
just that one synth via this method? I may add another mono at a much later
date, but that's only 50/50 chance.

Also the CV breakout box seems to be massive with loads of CV sockets etc
which just won't be used in my set-up...

Any opinions please?

Thanks,

John





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: CVIO option overkill for one mono synth? Opinions?

2011-07-09 by John

Thanks James. I've realised  apart from it's CV/Gate output, the Kenton Pro Solo Mk2 also outputs din sync, and 12, 24, or 48 clocks per quarter note which will be essential to drive my LM2 (48 cpqn). These extras,  plus the cash saving are steering me towards the CVIO less Cirklon + kenton Pro Solo Mk2.......

Colin is there a way to "advance" midi timing to an individual Cirklon port? For in my example to compensate for any latency introduced by the the conversion from Cirklon midi out > Kenton > CV/Gate out? That must introduce at least a few milliseconds of latency.

John

--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "James R. Coplin" <james@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> A Kenton Pro Solo new is 116ukp and the upcharge on the Cirklon is 200ukp.
> They are a little different but it seems the price differential is close
> enough to make the CVIO option reasonable and if you get a modular rig or
> some other monosynth in the future you are already hooked up.  I suppose it
> depends on if the 84ukp savings is worth the integration by having another
> piece or if the savings of 200ukp is worth not using your monosynth with the
> Cirklon - which seems a bit of a waste but perhaps not depending on your
> music.
> 
>  
> 
> James R. Coplin
> 
>  
> 
> From: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John
> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 6:37 AM
> To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [analogue-sequencer] CVIO option overkill for one mono synth?
> Opinions?
> 
>  
> 
>   
> 
> I've five midi synths and one CV/Gate mono SH101 and just wondering if the
> Cirklon CVIO option would be overkill.... and an expensive way of sequencing
> just that one synth via this method? I may add another mono at a much later
> date, but that's only 50/50 chance.
> 
> Also the CV breakout box seems to be massive with loads of CV sockets etc
> which just won't be used in my set-up...
> 
> Any opinions please?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Re: CVIO option overkill for one mono synth? Opinions?

2011-07-09 by John

Can someone clarify what exactly the extra £200 for the CVIO Cirklon gets you?
Is it a) a 25-pin D-connector on the rear panel of the sequencer
or b) an actual external break box  ?

If the standard Cirklon (£999) comes with the 25 pin connector, then it must be possible to "upgrade" and add the breakout box at a later date....? 

John



--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "John" <johnplaiduk@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> 
> Thanks James. I've realised  apart from it's CV/Gate output, the Kenton Pro Solo Mk2 also outputs din sync, and 12, 24, or 48 clocks per quarter note which will be essential to drive my LM2 (48 cpqn). These extras,  plus the cash saving are steering me towards the CVIO less Cirklon + kenton Pro Solo Mk2.......
> 
> Colin is there a way to "advance" midi timing to an individual Cirklon port? For in my example to compensate for any latency introduced by the the conversion from Cirklon midi out > Kenton > CV/Gate out? That must introduce at least a few milliseconds of latency.
> 
> John
> 
> --- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "James R. Coplin" <james@> wrote:
> >
> > A Kenton Pro Solo new is 116ukp and the upcharge on the Cirklon is 200ukp.
> > They are a little different but it seems the price differential is close
> > enough to make the CVIO option reasonable and if you get a modular rig or
> > some other monosynth in the future you are already hooked up.  I suppose it
> > depends on if the 84ukp savings is worth the integration by having another
> > piece or if the savings of 200ukp is worth not using your monosynth with the
> > Cirklon - which seems a bit of a waste but perhaps not depending on your
> > music.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > James R. Coplin
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > From: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John
> > Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 6:37 AM
> > To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [analogue-sequencer] CVIO option overkill for one mono synth?
> > Opinions?
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >   
> > 
> > I've five midi synths and one CV/Gate mono SH101 and just wondering if the
> > Cirklon CVIO option would be overkill.... and an expensive way of sequencing
> > just that one synth via this method? I may add another mono at a much later
> > date, but that's only 50/50 chance.
> > 
> > Also the CV breakout box seems to be massive with loads of CV sockets etc
> > which just won't be used in my set-up...
> > 
> > Any opinions please?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > John
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: CVIO option overkill for one mono synth? Opinions?

2011-07-09 by Ditton33

No pin connector with the standard cirklon, just a blanking plate.

I'm not sure but it probs can be retro fitted.

It you are remotely interested in cv then having this fitted is a
no-brainer. And yes the extra cost does cover the break-out box I believe. 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com 
> >[mailto:analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John
> >Sent: 09 July 2011 12:37
> >To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: [analogue-sequencer] Re: CVIO option overkill for 
> >one mono synth? Opinions?
> >
> >Can someone clarify what exactly the extra £200 for the CVIO 
> >Cirklon gets you?
> >Is it a) a 25-pin D-connector on the rear panel of the 
> >sequencer or b) an actual external break box  ?
> >
> >If the standard Cirklon (£999) comes with the 25 pin 
> >connector, then it must be possible to "upgrade" and add the 
> >breakout box at a later date....? 
> >
> >John
> >
> >
> >
> >--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "John" 
> ><johnplaiduk@...> wrote:
> >>
> >> 
> >> Thanks James. I've realised  apart from it's CV/Gate 
> >output, the Kenton Pro Solo Mk2 also outputs din sync, and 
> >12, 24, or 48 clocks per quarter note which will be 
> >essential to drive my LM2 (48 cpqn). These extras,  plus the 
> >cash saving are steering me towards the CVIO less Cirklon + 
> >kenton Pro Solo Mk2.......
> >> 
> >> Colin is there a way to "advance" midi timing to an 
> >individual Cirklon port? For in my example to compensate for 
> >any latency introduced by the the conversion from Cirklon 
> >midi out > Kenton > CV/Gate out? That must introduce at 
> >least a few milliseconds of latency.
> >> 
> >> John
> >> 
> >> --- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "James R. 
> >Coplin" <james@> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > A Kenton Pro Solo new is 116ukp and the upcharge on the 
> >Cirklon is 200ukp.
> >> > They are a little different but it seems the price 
> >differential is 
> >> > close enough to make the CVIO option reasonable and if you get a 
> >> > modular rig or some other monosynth in the future you 
> >are already 
> >> > hooked up.  I suppose it depends on if the 84ukp savings 
> >is worth 
> >> > the integration by having another piece or if the 
> >savings of 200ukp 
> >> > is worth not using your monosynth with the Cirklon - 
> >which seems a 
> >> > bit of a waste but perhaps not depending on your music.
> >> > 
> >> >  
> >> > 
> >> > James R. Coplin
> >> > 
> >> >  
> >> > 
> >> > From: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com
> >> > [mailto:analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John
> >> > Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 6:37 AM
> >> > To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com
> >> > Subject: [analogue-sequencer] CVIO option overkill for 
> >one mono synth?
> >> > Opinions?
> >> > 
> >> >  
> >> > 
> >> >   
> >> > 
> >> > I've five midi synths and one CV/Gate mono SH101 and 
> >just wondering 
> >> > if the Cirklon CVIO option would be overkill.... and an 
> >expensive 
> >> > way of sequencing just that one synth via this method? I may add 
> >> > another mono at a much later date, but that's only 50/50 chance.
> >> > 
> >> > Also the CV breakout box seems to be massive with loads of CV 
> >> > sockets etc which just won't be used in my set-up...
> >> > 
> >> > Any opinions please?
> >> > 
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > 
> >> > John
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >

Re: CVIO option overkill for one mono synth? Opinions?

2011-07-09 by samfrigard@ymail.com

I was recently told that it is easy for the user to install the cvio upgrade at a later date. That's what I plan on doing.

--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, Ian Mantripp <ianmantripp@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> ok, so the next question is: can the CVIO option be ordered and (easily) installed on site or does the Cirklon need to go back to Sequentix ?
> 
> Ian
> 
> 
> On Saturday 9 July 2011 at 14:19, Ditton33 wrote:
> 
> > No pin connector with the standard cirklon, just a blanking plate.
> > 
> >  I'm not sure but it probs can be retro fitted.
> > 
> >  It you are remotely interested in cv then having this fitted is a
> >  no-brainer. And yes the extra cost does cover the break-out box I believe. 
> > 
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com) 
> > > >[mailto:analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com)] On Behalf Of John
> > > >Sent: 09 July 2011 12:37
> > > >To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com)
> > > >Subject: [analogue-sequencer] Re: CVIO option overkill for 
> > > >one mono synth? Opinions?
> > > >
> > > >Can someone clarify what exactly the extra £200 for the CVIO 
> > > >Cirklon gets you?
> > > >Is it a) a 25-pin D-connector on the rear panel of the 
> > > >sequencer or b) an actual external break box ?
> > > >
> > > >If the standard Cirklon (£999) comes with the 25 pin 
> > > >connector, then it must be possible to "upgrade" and add the 
> > > >breakout box at a later date....? 
> > > >
> > > >John
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com), "John" 
> > > ><johnplaiduk@> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> 
> > > >> Thanks James. I've realised apart from it's CV/Gate 
> > > >output, the Kenton Pro Solo Mk2 also outputs din sync, and 
> > > >12, 24, or 48 clocks per quarter note which will be 
> > > >essential to drive my LM2 (48 cpqn). These extras, plus the 
> > > >cash saving are steering me towards the CVIO less Cirklon + 
> > > >kenton Pro Solo Mk2.......
> > > >> 
> > > >> Colin is there a way to "advance" midi timing to an 
> > > >individual Cirklon port? For in my example to compensate for 
> > > >any latency introduced by the the conversion from Cirklon 
> > > >midi out > Kenton > CV/Gate out? That must introduce at 
> > > >least a few milliseconds of latency.
> > > >> 
> > > >> John
> > > >> 
> > > >> --- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com), "James R. 
> > > >Coplin" <james@> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > A Kenton Pro Solo new is 116ukp and the upcharge on the 
> > > >Cirklon is 200ukp.
> > > >> > They are a little different but it seems the price 
> > > >differential is 
> > > >> > close enough to make the CVIO option reasonable and if you get a 
> > > >> > modular rig or some other monosynth in the future you 
> > > >are already 
> > > >> > hooked up. I suppose it depends on if the 84ukp savings 
> > > >is worth 
> > > >> > the integration by having another piece or if the 
> > > >savings of 200ukp 
> > > >> > is worth not using your monosynth with the Cirklon - 
> > > >which seems a 
> > > >> > bit of a waste but perhaps not depending on your music.
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > James R. Coplin
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > From: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com)
> > > >> > [mailto:analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com)] On Behalf Of John
> > > >> > Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 6:37 AM
> > > >> > To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com)
> > > >> > Subject: [analogue-sequencer] CVIO option overkill for 
> > > >one mono synth?
> > > >> > Opinions?
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > I've five midi synths and one CV/Gate mono SH101 and 
> > > >just wondering 
> > > >> > if the Cirklon CVIO option would be overkill.... and an 
> > > >expensive 
> > > >> > way of sequencing just that one synth via this method? I may add 
> > > >> > another mono at a much later date, but that's only 50/50 chance.
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > Also the CV breakout box seems to be massive with loads of CV 
> > > >> > sockets etc which just won't be used in my set-up...
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > Any opinions please?
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > Thanks,
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > John
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > 
> >  
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: CVIO option overkill for one mono synth? Opinions?

2011-07-09 by Ian Mantripp

ok, so the next question is: can the CVIO option be ordered and (easily) installed on site or does the Cirklon need to go back to Sequentix ?

Ian


On Saturday 9 July 2011 at 14:19, Ditton33 wrote:

> No pin connector with the standard cirklon, just a blanking plate.
> 
>  I'm not sure but it probs can be retro fitted.
> 
>  It you are remotely interested in cv then having this fitted is a
>  no-brainer. And yes the extra cost does cover the break-out box I believe. 
> 
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com) 
> > >[mailto:analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com)] On Behalf Of John
> > >Sent: 09 July 2011 12:37
> > >To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com)
> > >Subject: [analogue-sequencer] Re: CVIO option overkill for 
> > >one mono synth? Opinions?
> > >
> > >Can someone clarify what exactly the extra £200 for the CVIO 
> > >Cirklon gets you?
> > >Is it a) a 25-pin D-connector on the rear panel of the 
> > >sequencer or b) an actual external break box ?
> > >
> > >If the standard Cirklon (£999) comes with the 25 pin 
> > >connector, then it must be possible to "upgrade" and add the 
> > >breakout box at a later date....? 
> > >
> > >John
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com), "John" 
> > ><johnplaiduk@...> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> 
> > >> Thanks James. I've realised apart from it's CV/Gate 
> > >output, the Kenton Pro Solo Mk2 also outputs din sync, and 
> > >12, 24, or 48 clocks per quarter note which will be 
> > >essential to drive my LM2 (48 cpqn). These extras, plus the 
> > >cash saving are steering me towards the CVIO less Cirklon + 
> > >kenton Pro Solo Mk2.......
> > >> 
> > >> Colin is there a way to "advance" midi timing to an 
> > >individual Cirklon port? For in my example to compensate for 
> > >any latency introduced by the the conversion from Cirklon 
> > >midi out > Kenton > CV/Gate out? That must introduce at 
> > >least a few milliseconds of latency.
> > >> 
> > >> John
> > >> 
> > >> --- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com), "James R. 
> > >Coplin" <james@> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > A Kenton Pro Solo new is 116ukp and the upcharge on the 
> > >Cirklon is 200ukp.
> > >> > They are a little different but it seems the price 
> > >differential is 
> > >> > close enough to make the CVIO option reasonable and if you get a 
> > >> > modular rig or some other monosynth in the future you 
> > >are already 
> > >> > hooked up. I suppose it depends on if the 84ukp savings 
> > >is worth 
> > >> > the integration by having another piece or if the 
> > >savings of 200ukp 
> > >> > is worth not using your monosynth with the Cirklon - 
> > >which seems a 
> > >> > bit of a waste but perhaps not depending on your music.
> > >> > 
> > >> > 
> > >> > 
> > >> > James R. Coplin
> > >> > 
> > >> > 
> > >> > 
> > >> > From: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com)
> > >> > [mailto:analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com)] On Behalf Of John
> > >> > Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 6:37 AM
> > >> > To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com)
> > >> > Subject: [analogue-sequencer] CVIO option overkill for 
> > >one mono synth?
> > >> > Opinions?
> > >> > 
> > >> > 
> > >> > 
> > >> > 
> > >> > 
> > >> > I've five midi synths and one CV/Gate mono SH101 and 
> > >just wondering 
> > >> > if the Cirklon CVIO option would be overkill.... and an 
> > >expensive 
> > >> > way of sequencing just that one synth via this method? I may add 
> > >> > another mono at a much later date, but that's only 50/50 chance.
> > >> > 
> > >> > Also the CV breakout box seems to be massive with loads of CV 
> > >> > sockets etc which just won't be used in my set-up...
> > >> > 
> > >> > Any opinions please?
> > >> > 
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > 
> > >> > John
> > >> > 
> > >> > 
> > >> > 
> > >> > 
> > >> > 
> > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >------------------------------------
> > >
> > >Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> 
>  



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: CVIO option overkill for one mono synth? Opinions?

2011-07-09 by John

--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "samfrigard@..." <samfrigard@...> wrote:
>
> I was recently told that it is easy for the user to install the cvio upgrade at a later date. That's what I plan on doing.

With the "CVIO upgrade" meaning to add the 25 pin d-connector to the back of Cirklon?
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> --- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, Ian Mantripp <ianmantripp@> wrote:
> >
> > ok, so the next question is: can the CVIO option be ordered and (easily) installed on site or does the Cirklon need to go back to Sequentix ?
> > 
> > Ian
> > 
> > 
> > On Saturday 9 July 2011 at 14:19, Ditton33 wrote:
> > 
> > > No pin connector with the standard cirklon, just a blanking plate.
> > > 
> > >  I'm not sure but it probs can be retro fitted.
> > > 
> > >  It you are remotely interested in cv then having this fitted is a
> > >  no-brainer. And yes the extra cost does cover the break-out box I believe. 
> > > 
> > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > >From: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com) 
> > > > >[mailto:analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com)] On Behalf Of John
> > > > >Sent: 09 July 2011 12:37
> > > > >To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com)
> > > > >Subject: [analogue-sequencer] Re: CVIO option overkill for 
> > > > >one mono synth? Opinions?
> > > > >
> > > > >Can someone clarify what exactly the extra £200 for the CVIO 
> > > > >Cirklon gets you?
> > > > >Is it a) a 25-pin D-connector on the rear panel of the 
> > > > >sequencer or b) an actual external break box ?
> > > > >
> > > > >If the standard Cirklon (£999) comes with the 25 pin 
> > > > >connector, then it must be possible to "upgrade" and add the 
> > > > >breakout box at a later date....? 
> > > > >
> > > > >John
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com), "John" 
> > > > ><johnplaiduk@> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> Thanks James. I've realised apart from it's CV/Gate 
> > > > >output, the Kenton Pro Solo Mk2 also outputs din sync, and 
> > > > >12, 24, or 48 clocks per quarter note which will be 
> > > > >essential to drive my LM2 (48 cpqn). These extras, plus the 
> > > > >cash saving are steering me towards the CVIO less Cirklon + 
> > > > >kenton Pro Solo Mk2.......
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> Colin is there a way to "advance" midi timing to an 
> > > > >individual Cirklon port? For in my example to compensate for 
> > > > >any latency introduced by the the conversion from Cirklon 
> > > > >midi out > Kenton > CV/Gate out? That must introduce at 
> > > > >least a few milliseconds of latency.
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> John
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> --- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com), "James R. 
> > > > >Coplin" <james@> wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > A Kenton Pro Solo new is 116ukp and the upcharge on the 
> > > > >Cirklon is 200ukp.
> > > > >> > They are a little different but it seems the price 
> > > > >differential is 
> > > > >> > close enough to make the CVIO option reasonable and if you get a 
> > > > >> > modular rig or some other monosynth in the future you 
> > > > >are already 
> > > > >> > hooked up. I suppose it depends on if the 84ukp savings 
> > > > >is worth 
> > > > >> > the integration by having another piece or if the 
> > > > >savings of 200ukp 
> > > > >> > is worth not using your monosynth with the Cirklon - 
> > > > >which seems a 
> > > > >> > bit of a waste but perhaps not depending on your music.
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> > James R. Coplin
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> > From: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com)
> > > > >> > [mailto:analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com)] On Behalf Of John
> > > > >> > Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 6:37 AM
> > > > >> > To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com)
> > > > >> > Subject: [analogue-sequencer] CVIO option overkill for 
> > > > >one mono synth?
> > > > >> > Opinions?
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> > I've five midi synths and one CV/Gate mono SH101 and 
> > > > >just wondering 
> > > > >> > if the Cirklon CVIO option would be overkill.... and an 
> > > > >expensive 
> > > > >> > way of sequencing just that one synth via this method? I may add 
> > > > >> > another mono at a much later date, but that's only 50/50 chance.
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> > Also the CV breakout box seems to be massive with loads of CV 
> > > > >> > sockets etc which just won't be used in my set-up...
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> > Any opinions please?
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> > John
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > 
> > >  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>

Re: [analogue-sequencer] CVIO option overkill for one mono synth? Opinions?

2011-07-11 by Paul Nagle

If anyone's interested I have a Kenton Pro2000 for sale or swaps. Just 
don't seem to need it now, especially as Cirklon can also work as a 
MIDI/USB interface driving synths on my iPad. :)

Paul
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On 08/07/2011 17:12, James R. Coplin wrote:
> A Kenton Pro Solo new is 116ukp and the upcharge on the Cirklon is 200ukp.
> They are a little different but it seems the price differential is close
> enough to make the CVIO option reasonable and if you get a modular rig or
> some other monosynth in the future you are already hooked up.  I suppose it
> depends on if the 84ukp savings is worth the integration by having another
> piece or if the savings of 200ukp is worth not using your monosynth with the
> Cirklon - which seems a bit of a waste but perhaps not depending on your
> music.
>
>
>
> James R. Coplin
>
>
>
> From: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John
> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 6:37 AM
> To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [analogue-sequencer] CVIO option overkill for one mono synth?
> Opinions?
>
>
>
>
>
> I've five midi synths and one CV/Gate mono SH101 and just wondering if the
> Cirklon CVIO option would be overkill.... and an expensive way of sequencing
> just that one synth via this method? I may add another mono at a much later
> date, but that's only 50/50 chance.
>
> Also the CV breakout box seems to be massive with loads of CV sockets etc
> which just won't be used in my set-up...
>
> Any opinions please?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Re: [analogue-sequencer] CVIO option overkill for one mono synth? Opinions?

2011-07-11 by Ian Mantripp

Can Cirklon also be used to record audio into Logic (or other) ?

Ian


On Monday 11 July 2011 at 09:55, Paul Nagle wrote:

> If anyone's interested I have a Kenton Pro2000 for sale or swaps. Just 
>  don't seem to need it now, especially as Cirklon can also work as a 
>  MIDI/USB interface driving synths on my iPad. :)
> 
>  Paul
> 
>  On 08/07/2011 17:12, James R. Coplin wrote:
> > A Kenton Pro Solo new is 116ukp and the upcharge on the Cirklon is 200ukp.
> > They are a little different but it seems the price differential is close
> > enough to make the CVIO option reasonable and if you get a modular rig or
> > some other monosynth in the future you are already hooked up. I suppose it
> > depends on if the 84ukp savings is worth the integration by having another
> > piece or if the savings of 200ukp is worth not using your monosynth with the
> > Cirklon - which seems a bit of a waste but perhaps not depending on your
> > music.
> >
> >
> >
> > James R. Coplin
> >
> >
> >
> > From: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com)
> > [mailto:analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com)] On Behalf Of John
> > Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 6:37 AM
> > To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com)
> > Subject: [analogue-sequencer] CVIO option overkill for one mono synth?
> > Opinions?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I've five midi synths and one CV/Gate mono SH101 and just wondering if the
> > Cirklon CVIO option would be overkill.... and an expensive way of sequencing
> > just that one synth via this method? I may add another mono at a much later
> > date, but that's only 50/50 chance.
> >
> > Also the CV breakout box seems to be massive with loads of CV sockets etc
> > which just won't be used in my set-up...
> >
> > Any opinions please?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>  



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: CVIO option overkill for one mono synth? Opinions?

2011-07-12 by John

--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, Paul Nagle <softroom@...> wrote:
> If anyone's interested I have a Kenton Pro2000 for sale or swaps. Just 
> don't seem to need it now, especially as Cirklon can also work as a 
> MIDI/USB interface driving synths on my iPad. :)
> 
> Paul

Paul i've seen you mention you use Cirklon together with Logic. What's your exact setup + workflow?
Is it  Cirklon midi ins/ outs direct to your hardware synths, with Logic MTC sync to Cirklon, with Logic recording audio?
Thanks.

John

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: CVIO option overkill for one mono synth? Opinions?

2011-07-12 by Paul Nagle

On 12/07/2011 20:19, John wrote:

> Paul i've seen you mention you use Cirklon together with Logic. What's your exact setup + workflow?
> Is it  Cirklon midi ins/ outs direct to your hardware synths, with Logic MTC sync to Cirklon, with Logic recording audio?
> Thanks.

I don't do very much of this actually, I prefer to keep my work and my 
fun separate. So Logic is almost always used with softsynths and my live 
stuff based around hardware.
Usually if I sync to Logic at all (i.e. to test some Cirklon 
functionality), I have it as master with Cirklon driving the hardware 
gear. I would typically record the audio into Logic tracks and then 
shunt it around as per any loop. The vast majority of my own tracks I've 
recorded in the past, heck, years and years, have been done in one pass 
straight to stereo from P3 (now Cirklon). I've recorded the bulk of what 
I've done directly into Wavelab, warts and all. Alas, can't have warts 
in my "proper" music...

-- 
Paul
---
http://www.softroom.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/WilyEPeyote

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.