Analogue-sequencer

On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:09:10 +0100, Robert van der Kamp
<robnet@wxs.nl> wrote:

>Same here. When writing music I keep my PC switched off. The 
>PC is only used when printing to audio, mixing and 
>mastering is done.

Me too.

>But now I have a problem. I like to toy around with my new 
>modular system, and when I hear something great, I want to 
>record it in high quality audio, so that I can use it later 
>in a song.
>But that would mean I have to switch on the damn PC. :(

For me the DAT comes into play here.

>It's that bad, that I'm now looking around for a 
>multitracker (like the DPS16 I once owned) to make quick 
>and good recordings in 24-bit/96k without the need of the 
>PC. Switching on the thing would be a lot cheaper, I 
>know...

Good idea.  My Roland VS-880 could also do the job I guess. 

Ah, you can't beat a good old-fashioned step sequencer. Except by a
super-duper new one like the P3. Newsflash - the P3 now streaks past
the Notron and becomes the Number One step sequencer of all time. Moog
960, ARP.. forget them!

Sobering thoughts eh?

Paul
---
Paul Nagle - SoftRoom Music - www.softroom.co.uk
          Bogus Focus Records - www.BogusFocus.com