Analogue-sequencer

Overall Timing of a Software step sequencer would be horrible.
Only programmed specialized hardware can hold up with a good
Timing/groove. Technically the current Linux / osx / windows OS have
A bad realtime sheduling and ext. USB controllers won't work accurate
enough in comparison to hardware like P3, SAM-16, MAQ16/3, or  
grooveboxes like MPC, etc.


On 19.11.2008, at 04:33, "Sylvain Delisle" <sdelisle@sympatico.ca>  
wrote:

> I always felt that the universe is missing something like a "software
> only" P3 that would integrate with a controller like the BCR2000.
> The BCR2000 just begs to be a step sequencer controller. It's lying
> there waiting for the perfect software.
>
> And then there's the P3 that is one of the greatest sequencer on
> Earth but that is expensive to built, mostly because it's built with
> a decicated controller.
>
> Food for thoughts? Ok, that won't give us a CV sequencer, but the P3
> wasn't either.
>
> Sylvain
>
> --- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, dave@... wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, November 18, 2008 3:24 am, Nick Rothwell wrote:
> > > On 18 Nov 2008, at 01:30, Jim Combs wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> http://www.hobnox.com/index.1056.de.html
> > >>
> > >
> > > If this is actually doing what it seems to be doing, I'm very
> > > impressed...
> > >
> > > (What next: a P3 sequencer in my web browser?)
> > >
> > No Virtual P3 that I'm aware of , but the Midibox people are working
> > on putting up a Virtual Midibox Seq V4....
> > http://www.ucapps.de/midibox_seq_virtual.html
> >
> >
> > Cheeers,
> > Dave
> >
>
> 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]