On Tuesday 09 December 2003 23:03, Frank Vanaman wrote: > Yes, them. Heh. I like the feel of these particular > switch assemblies, and anyone that doesn't like, er, > *that* font :-) could very easily change the inserts, as > the cap lifts off and allows you to put in whatever you > like. I know, but it's too much fun to tease Colin about it once in a while (okay, make that twice a day ;). > Supose we could, though making a long slot for PC mount > switches seems to be a bit easier to handle than making a > whole boat-load of rectangular/square holes, especially > as I'd be 'machining' this with just about the simplest > metalworking tools. I can do round holes in metal just > fine, thanks, but when it comes to little square ones, > I'd prefer to make as few as possible. I wonder if Stooge panels can have square holes. So far I only see round ones. Hmm. > Presuming these would be the MOTM-600 style buttons with > in-built LEDs? Might be OK if they support the > bi/tri-color function required by Colin's board. I think > I'd prefer separate LEDs in their own apertures, and a > channel (for 1-16 buttons) or big square hole (for the 9 > function keys) for the buttons, personally (it gets back > to putting the non-round holes in the panel, for me). I like the MOTM lens style of LEDs. Hope they come in tri-colour versions. So let's agree on a row of LEDs, like on Colin's original panel. - Robert
Message
Re: [analogue-sequencer] Stooged P3 panel
2003-12-10 by Robert van der Kamp
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.