On Tuesday 09 December 2003 17:35, Frank Vanaman wrote: > hi all-- > > Um. Well, if that made the difference between having a > stooge panel and not, then I could be convinced with > little effort on that one! :-) Heh. ;) > >What buttons are you referring to? > > The square ones, of course! :-) I guess if you're > asking, then the proposed Stooge panel probably will not > accommodate them. You can see them on the rack-mounted > version shown at the main page of the Yahoo group pages > for this list. > > Oh, wait, a link: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analogue-sequencer/ > *those* square buttons... > > Hope I got the link right. You should not have to sign in > to Yahoo to see the image, as it's on the top level of > the pages. Ah, you mean the 'standard' Colin square buttons with the <cough> beautiful <cough> SF printing? (You can always kick me off the list Colin. ;) I had square buttons in mind too. More space to hit at. ;) But what about the ones used in the MOTM-600 sequencer or the MOTM-650 shown here: http://www.synthtech.com/new_stuff.html (Scroll down 75% of the page.) These look a bit more stylish to me. More sober. Especially the ones used on the MOTM-600. Maybe we can use those LEDs too, to replace the standard row of LEDS in the original panel.
Message
Re: [analogue-sequencer] Stooged P3 panel is an option. Interested?
2003-12-09 by Robert van der Kamp
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.