On Tuesday 09 December 2003 16:49, Frank Vanaman wrote: > Hi all-- > > I'd be provisionally interested as well. A couple > thoughts: $100 (or a bit more) would be OK with me, > pricewise. Okay, this would make four of us already. :) > > The MOTM grid is all well and good, but not at the > expense of having to remote the pots from the PC boards > or change the button spacing. My vote would be to > maintain the spacings for controls as set up on Colin's > boards. That may or may not be possible. I *really* like to use the smaller motm style knobs *with* tickmarks. The marks need some space. Maybe it's possible with the current spacings. We'll have to find out. Personally, I don't mind soldering the pots away from the pcboard. > I'd also prefer to have the 9 button matrix under > the display so that the function keys line up! Very much agree with this one. > The last thought is this: what kind of switches/buttons > is everyone that'd be interested in having a Stooge-P3 > planning on using? I've opted for the funky square > buttons (except for the two mode select buttons) like the > setup shown on the main page of the Yahoo pages, so if > everyone else opted for the round buttons, then I might > have to opt-out. What buttons are you referring to? - Robert
Message
Re: [analogue-sequencer] Stooged P3 panel is an option. Interested?
2003-12-09 by Robert van der Kamp
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.