On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Sascha Matzke wrote: > While we're in this "a free wish everyone" mood ;-). I think it would > be great if the P3 had endless encoders with LED rings - but that > would be another "feature" to push the price up. I think we've talked about that before on the list... I sure know I've come up with a few P4 designs incorporating those elements. But I now hate them all. Know why? Look at the range of values the parameters behind those knobs can have, 0-128. That's *far* too many values to represent by an LED ring. Your typical bass line doesn't even extend over an octave, so even if you had a luxurious 32 LEDs in the ring (do those even exist?) that would leave you with 4 notes per LED (assuming a range of 128). So in a bass line using F2, F#2 and G#2, for example, all these notes would be represented on the same LED, which actually misleads us into thinking all the notes are the same. And this doesn't even touch the special issue that the P3 has, different note ranges. The only way to reach the goal we're attempting to reach via these LED ringed encoders is to incorporate some sort of plasma display around the encoder itself. (I have seen this done in a mixer somewhere... I can't remember where though.) That display can show the range as well as the encoder's position within that range. I guess there are other ways of doing this, but my point is that they're all ridicuolously expensive. Whoa... sorry for the soapbox, folks... Fred. bleep. out. --- http://leichenfeld.iuma.com http://thirdwavecollective.com
Message
Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: P3 news
2005-08-10 by bleep
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.