hei usualy i'm using my (sofware) sequencer for playing cutoffs, resonanzes, releases and stuff. its ok when the p3 cant do it, but on the other way it would be cool to edit a cutoff in a playing loop. with other words if the p3 could record the control data i'm doing live with a midicontroller to the synth (yea, thats the rockin' way) however, i'm still a P3 fanatic from logic to p3 to logic to synth and reverse mag www.magdesign.ch --- Gert van Santen <g.vansanten@chello.nl> wrote: > I agree. > I have changed my opinion after reading a couple of > comments. The P3 is, and > should stay, a sequencer. > > cheers, > > Gert > www.waveworld.tv _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [analogue-sequencer] Quick question
2004-10-21 by MAG
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.