Thanks for the tip on the ASR/ADSR combination! An SQP (n stages to n segments) is a good pairing, as well.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:51 AM, johnrichoux <jrichoux@...> wrote:
Hi Matt
I appreciate the verification. If it has to be, that's OK by me. Actually, it is a marvelous little module that I am just now beginning to appreciate. The ASR makes a good companion to it - rotating values to the segments.
Thanks again
jmr
--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, matthew carpenter <matfhew.carpenfer@...> wrote:
>
> Hi John,
> That's how mine works, as well. I remember Rex telling me that this is the
> way it has to be.
> Matt
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:57 AM, johnrichoux <jrichoux@...>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Hello all
> >
> > Would someone with an ADSR on their panels confirm something for me? When I
> > apply a CV to any of the blue inputs, it behaves as I would expect: +CV=
> > longer delay, decay, etc, consistent with knob direction. Except on the
> > attack portion, where +CV= shorter attack, the opposite of the knob
> > direction.
> >
> > So, I end up setting the attack knob to a maximum, then use +CV to shorten
> > it; conversely, I set the knob to a minimum and use -CV to lengthen it.
> >
> > If that really is the intent, perhaps someone could explain the advantage
> > to me. Does it have something to do with VC-All? Even then I would expect
> > +CV to lengthen the entire envelope (except for the delay portion).
> >
> > Thanks
> > jmr
> >
> >
> >
>