Maybe the thinking behind that design was the higher the voltage the steeper the curve, rather than voltage being related to duration?
ty
_______________
http://sublevel9.net
From:
SergeModular@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
SergeModular@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Kim Hansen
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009
1:11 PM
To: SergeModular@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [SergeModular] CV to
ADSR attack
same thing here -
kim
On Apr 21, 2009, at 5:14 PM, matthew carpenter wrote:
Hi John,
That's
how mine works, as well. I remember Rex telling me that this is the way it has
to be.
Matt
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:57 AM,
johnrichoux < jrichoux@... >
wrote:
Hello all
Would someone with an ADSR on their
panels confirm something for me? When I apply a CV to any of the blue inputs,
it behaves as I would expect: +CV= longer delay, decay, etc, consistent with
knob direction. Except on the attack portion, where +CV= shorter attack, the
opposite of the knob direction.
So, I end up setting the attack
knob to a maximum, then use +CV to shorten it; conversely, I set the knob to a
minimum and use -CV to lengthen it.
If that really is the intent,
perhaps someone could explain the advantage to me. Does it have something to do
with VC-All? Even then I would expect +CV to lengthen the entire envelope
(except for the delay portion).
Thanks
jmr