SergeModular

> sworry I was under the illusion this discussion was on the Serge
> site , and we were discussing Modcan's cloning of Serge ?

You are incredibly pedantic aren't you.
We *were* discussing ModCan and the fact that multiple modules my have been
'copied'. I never mentioned or even implied that Serge had cloned anybody
else's designs.
My original text:

>For one thing, just about every analogue synth has a similar
>envelope
> design, somebody copied somebody else's design somewhere.
> OK so many of the ModCan modules are copies, but many are no longer
> available from the original source.

How do you arrive at your statement:

>the Serge
> > modules are not as cloned as you suggest above

I think in the context of the discussion I was asking at which level modules
could be regarded as intellectual property and therefore subject to possible
lawsuits.
Rex maybe has a case with regard to Boolean Logic Modules, especially over
the similar face plate design. I was floating the concept that a DADSR is a
far more common module.
It really is as simple as that.
CW