--- In SergeModular@y..., "C. Whitten" <chris@c...> wrote:
site , and we were discussing Modcan's cloning of Serge ?
My point was: in the world of everyday synths there are
applied to Serge , who's designs are almost completely
unique/original.......I think it's you who's misunderstood ? I am
pointing out this argument doesnt either make it right to steal
designs . There are plenty of goode examples of original designs -
you have a Fenix I think ? and EMS are another that springs to mind ,
oh and Buchla , so.............seems copycat design is'nt really in
any way excusable...? If someone re-did some of your music w/ diff
instruments , but no credit to you , you'd be pissed off ?
do you see my point ?
> > m you've missed the point chris , think about it . the SergeSerge
> > modules are not as cloned as you suggest above . you're tarring
> > w/ the "normal" brush ?were any
> No Peter, you misread my contribution (again).
> At no point did I mention Serge in my email, let alone imply there
> cloned modules.sworry I was under the illusion this discussion was on the Serge
site , and we were discussing Modcan's cloning of Serge ?
My point was: in the world of everyday synths there are
> thousands of envelopes and oscillators all virtually identical. Ifthe first
> designer who came up with the now standard envelope or oscillatordesign had
> claimed intellectual copyright where would today's musician be.esoteric
> I didn't say that Rex shouldn't pursue ModCan over direct copies of
> modules, I just tried to make a general point about synthesizerdesigners
> suing each other.Yes , and my point remains -thes4e "arguments" cannot be so easily
applied to Serge , who's designs are almost completely
unique/original.......I think it's you who's misunderstood ? I am
pointing out this argument doesnt either make it right to steal
designs . There are plenty of goode examples of original designs -
you have a Fenix I think ? and EMS are another that springs to mind ,
oh and Buchla , so.............seems copycat design is'nt really in
any way excusable...? If someone re-did some of your music w/ diff
instruments , but no credit to you , you'd be pissed off ?
do you see my point ?
>owner of a
> Sebastian said:
> >Is every VCDO (and designs can differ widely) a copy of Digisound
> >only because they made it first, two decades ago?
>
> Actually as an owner of the ModCan Wavetable Oscillator and past
> Digisound version I would say that they are almost identical.That's not to
> say the internal circuits haven't been changed.surprised if
>
> My opinion and it is only my opinion!.....is that I would be
> ModCan has stolen any substantial business from STS. In additionthe market
> for both systems has got to be so small, what in cash terms would behe would
> achieved if Rex sued? It would probably cost him more than anything
> recoup.saying
> When this thread kicked off I thought Smoggers would have been
> "great, another banana based system with alternative modules andyou can buy
> modules separately". I'm surprised that the overall tone so far hasbeen
> "lets get the lawyers in".
> CW