--- In SergeModular@y..., "C. Whitten" <chris@c...> wrote:
nonsense.
I realise , this is the commonest "critiscism" of the serge
system , but it's always been a non-issue for me .
This will probably start a rain of mail , but I always found 12db
per o. filters better sounding on units I have offering both
options ,anyway.
I really wonder if it's all started from a spinal tap "goes up to
11" - larger the number (db per o. in this instance) the hotter the
product ?
Do you find your FENIX filters much better in 24 db as opposed to
12 db mode ? My unit was modded from new , but was your filter much
differant before/after Bert mod'd it ?
regards
p.k.
> > You have aq fenix ? whats the problem ?modular'.
> Just having a debate mate!!!!
> The whole thing came out of Bill's request for info on a 'first
> I'm not the one who has questioned the Serge filters, criticism hascropped
> up now and again (more often on Analogue Heaven).should rest
> Call me devil's advocate, my only point being:
> Why not debate another Serge filter, unless you think the system
> on it's laurels and never develop. It doesn't have to be 'clichedmoog/tb303
> drivel' either.Good stuff . Glad someone out there is'nt blinded by moog/tb303
nonsense.
I realise , this is the commonest "critiscism" of the serge
system , but it's always been a non-issue for me .
This will probably start a rain of mail , but I always found 12db
per o. filters better sounding on units I have offering both
options ,anyway.
I really wonder if it's all started from a spinal tap "goes up to
11" - larger the number (db per o. in this instance) the hotter the
product ?
Do you find your FENIX filters much better in 24 db as opposed to
12 db mode ? My unit was modded from new , but was your filter much
differant before/after Bert mod'd it ?
regards
p.k.