SergeModular

Peter, I have not yet experienced the privilege of knowing you as an artist,
which is purported to help me understand you. So far I've been having hard
times sorting out your certainly interesting knowledge between lots of
affected, at best meta-relevant personal criticisms. I ask you, is this the
fault of the people whom you are criticising so relentlessly?

Please imagine the chaos we would be seeing if all the concerned persons
actually replied agreeing, disagreeing, insights, argumenting, defending,
justifying, whatever (what do you want by the way?). Please imagine how you
will feel if after some time no one replied anymore because you always want
to get the the last word in anyway.

If you will (why would you by the way?) you can feel about this as ban
request #2 (unfortunately the supposed #1 has left Putney already). I will
not hand out any further complaints publicly, as this, like your rants, is
at best relevant about the list itself if not OT and will probably not help
anything. But I certainly wouldn't be happy making up my first killfile.

Sebastian Kuehnl

----- Original Message -----
From: <sonic@...>
To: <SergeModular@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2001 5:00 AM
Subject: [SergeModular] Re: "Random" modules


: --- In SergeModular@y..., "Bill Felton" <bfelton@m...> wrote:
: > Sorry, but not at all.
:
: dont be sorry , pleese.
:
: > The original message inquired as to the
: > probability of recreating the 'combined'
: > noise source plus random voltage generator
: > module with the separates. The probability
: > of doing that is 1, that is, unity, that
: > is 100%, since the very patch required to
: > do this is presented in the Gold book.
: > ...
:
: o.k. that makes sense . being specific definately makes it clear -
: tho' I dont think it was , which was my main point.......
: I.M.O. However This is still a ridiculously convoluted way of
: saying "yes you can" , especially in this context......patching is
: hardly something one does , loosely speeking ,in any probabalistic
: way - especially in relation to his question , basically "you can" ,
: or "you cant" .It's hardly the realms of reel probaility or
: probabalistic patching....lets be serious theres no probability
: to.......Also , the Gold book has nothing to do with whether it is
: possible (or probable (in your very strictest sense)to patch a s& h /
: rvg from the "seperates".
: The fact this patch is in the book does not have any bearing on the
: probability/possibility of patching it . does it realy?
:
: Is this surreal ? have I crossed lines ? most weird ?
: see my point ?
:
: P>K>
:
:
:
: >
: > Bill
: >
: > > -----Original Message-----
: > > From: sonic@s...
: > > [mailto:sonic@s...]
: > > Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 1:50 PM
: > > To: SergeModular@y...
: > > Subject: [SergeModular] Re: "Random" modules
: > >
: > >
: > > --- In SergeModular@y..., "C. Whitten" <chris@c...> wrote:
: > > > > THE PROBABILITY IS 1 - THE PROBABILITY OF WHAT ?
: > > > Maybe he is trying to say that the patch discussed is 'probably'
: > > illustrated
: > > > in the Gold book.
: > >
: > > could be . it was a SLIGHTLY poorly worded message (I.M.O.),
: anyway
: > > you look at it.
: > > It doesnt directly refer to anything mentioned .
: > > POINT BEING .CLARITY IS ALL -ESPECIALLY IN THE COMPLEX WORLD OF
: SERGE
: > > THE BETTER WE UNDERSTAND , THE GREATER THE POTENTIAL.
: > > REGARDS
: > > P.K.
: > >
: > >
: > >
: > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
: > > SergeModular-unsubscribe@y...
: > >
: > > Keep on Patchin'!
: > >
: > >
: > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
: > >
: > >
:
:
: To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
: SergeModular-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
:
: Keep on Patchin'!
:
:
: Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
:


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @... address at http://mail.yahoo.com