--- In SergeModular@y..., "Bill Felton" <bfelton@m...> wrote:
tho' I dont think it was , which was my main point.......
I.M.O. However This is still a ridiculously convoluted way of
saying "yes you can" , especially in this context......patching is
hardly something one does , loosely speeking ,in any probabalistic
way - especially in relation to his question , basically "you can" ,
or "you cant" .It's hardly the realms of reel probaility or
probabalistic patching....lets be serious theres no probability
to.......Also , the Gold book has nothing to do with whether it is
possible (or probable (in your very strictest sense)to patch a s& h /
rvg from the "seperates".
The fact this patch is in the book does not have any bearing on the
probability/possibility of patching it . does it realy?
Is this surreal ? have I crossed lines ? most weird ?
see my point ?
P>K>
> Sorry, but not at all.dont be sorry , pleese.
> The original message inquired as to theo.k. that makes sense . being specific definately makes it clear -
> probability of recreating the 'combined'
> noise source plus random voltage generator
> module with the separates. The probability
> of doing that is 1, that is, unity, that
> is 100%, since the very patch required to
> do this is presented in the Gold book.
> ...
tho' I dont think it was , which was my main point.......
I.M.O. However This is still a ridiculously convoluted way of
saying "yes you can" , especially in this context......patching is
hardly something one does , loosely speeking ,in any probabalistic
way - especially in relation to his question , basically "you can" ,
or "you cant" .It's hardly the realms of reel probaility or
probabalistic patching....lets be serious theres no probability
to.......Also , the Gold book has nothing to do with whether it is
possible (or probable (in your very strictest sense)to patch a s& h /
rvg from the "seperates".
The fact this patch is in the book does not have any bearing on the
probability/possibility of patching it . does it realy?
Is this surreal ? have I crossed lines ? most weird ?
see my point ?
P>K>
>anyway
> Bill
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sonic@s...
> > [mailto:sonic@s...]
> > Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 1:50 PM
> > To: SergeModular@y...
> > Subject: [SergeModular] Re: "Random" modules
> >
> >
> > --- In SergeModular@y..., "C. Whitten" <chris@c...> wrote:
> > > > THE PROBABILITY IS 1 - THE PROBABILITY OF WHAT ?
> > > Maybe he is trying to say that the patch discussed is 'probably'
> > illustrated
> > > in the Gold book.
> >
> > could be . it was a SLIGHTLY poorly worded message (I.M.O.),
> > you look at it.SERGE
> > It doesnt directly refer to anything mentioned .
> > POINT BEING .CLARITY IS ALL -ESPECIALLY IN THE COMPLEX WORLD OF
> > THE BETTER WE UNDERSTAND , THE GREATER THE POTENTIAL.http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > REGARDS
> > P.K.
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > SergeModular-unsubscribe@y...
> >
> > Keep on Patchin'!
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> >
> >