--- In SergeModular@y..., "Ken Stone" <sasami@h...> wrote:
mixer (albeit sans attentuation?
indeed sir , you're right - or setting up a pre-determined
matrix for intensive cross-modulations . Merzbow need apply.
. If we can offer larger matrices cheap -its a coming - we shall .
course there are a zillion synths where 16 ins /outs is plenty.
I like the sound of your programmer/sequencer . will you use pins?
> Well, in the tech world, fanning is applied to one output going tothanks ken . can we thus say a multiple is a
> many inputs. The opposite is called .... mixing! (and a few other
> things as well).
mixer (albeit sans attentuation?
> last few weeks, and I do plan to put a 12x10 pin matrix in mybenefit.
> sequencer/programmer panel. All that it can achieve is to allow
> quicker patching of "sequences" (i.e. which programmer stage is
> triggered by which seq output - remember my serge is ancient). With
> the over 80 jacks per panel a Serge usually has, a 16 x 16 would
> really be too limited for anything but handling "live performance"
> patches, where it would actually prove to have a significant
indeed sir , you're right - or setting up a pre-determined
matrix for intensive cross-modulations . Merzbow need apply.
. If we can offer larger matrices cheap -its a coming - we shall .
course there are a zillion synths where 16 ins /outs is plenty.
I like the sound of your programmer/sequencer . will you use pins?
>16
> My AU$0.04 worth (approx US$0.02)
>
> Ken
>
> --- In SergeModular@y..., John Papiewski <johnp299792@a...> wrote:
> > ...Anybody care to comment on the usefulness of being able to fan
> outputs
> > to one input, without any individual attenuation?