> I have responded with... it was not neccessary and incorrect in myYou have to admit that Rolls Royce has
> view to try and imply that any of us were in some way applauding
> Rex's business policies to be part of some sort of 'elite'
> or 'snob' club.
>
snob appeal. By comparing the STS
production approach to Rolls Royce,
the debator has, perhaps inadvertantly,
suggested that STS has snob appeal. I
was merely commenting on the argument
that the current STS productions approach,
which has been likened to Rolls Royce,
makes quality control in single modules
diffcult. I think that is a weak argument.
I didn't compare STS to Rolls Royce. If
I misunderstood the argument, my mistake
and I apologize if you or any other people
feel accused of snobbery.
Ethan