QTR-Quadtone RIP

Hi Brian and Jari ,

I don't think the lack of a profile can be the problem. Although 
using another but similar paper's profile isn't ideal, I can't 
believe it would have the effect of flooding the Permajet paper with 
ink to the extent that it is virtually all black! There surely can't 
be that much difference between two profiles for matte paper. Of all 
the profiles on QTR I'd imagine there must be one that would give at 
least reasonable results on Permajet. If someone knows better, can 
you please put me right.

Jari, I haven't had time yet to try your suggestion of printing at 
1440 but will definitely give it a go. Thanks.



--- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "Brian Ellis" <bellis60@...> 
wrote:
>
> You might try using a paper for which there's a profile.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bruce Robbins" <bruce.robbins@...>
> To: <QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 3:54 PM
> Subject: [QuadtoneRIP] Initial QTR results very poor-help needed...
> 
> 
> I'm using QTR on a PC running XP. Files saved as greyscale tiffs as
> instructed and dragged to the print window. The results are 
terrible. Black
> and white photographs are printing very, very dark-wasting lots of 
ink
> (Eboni matt black and UT colour cartridges) in the process. I'm 
printing on
> Permajet Museum Classic for which there doesn't appear to be a 
profile so
> I've used the EEM profile (and tried one or two others as well with 
the
> same results).
> 
> Can anyone say what might be going wrong here? Using the limit and
> gamma adjustment tools help a little but prints are still far too 
dark. 
> Other
> than sending a very light file to QTR, is there a solution?
> 
> Thanks,
> Bruce
>