--- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, q v s f u e k p s
v h s l w <izimizam@...> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> i made my vote :) thats cool regards the wavetable .Digital
in analogue? well i hope so , i think its the missing link and
future of modular hardware systems along with bring back some
of the rare and obscure stuff .Weird digital noises are lovely , i
love the idea of the harmonic osc . . .cv mod per slider also?
Absolutely.
, cross mod . . .all sorts of potential.Bit cruncher - yes please
.The Milton? my guess is there are more than a few people ready
to punce on this ! Digital circuits , we we have to agree they can
make for some really bad filters and in general can really fall
short of the mark at times but in realtion to creative sound design
digital can be cool.
Everyone's opinion is legit, so here is mine:
I'm not so keen on digital when used for sound generation or
processing (outside of delay, where digtal completely
outperforms analog)...but for control voltage generators they are
supurb. Random voltages, sequencers of course (all
sequencers are digital at their core, little difference if that binary
data is coming from a microP or CMOS) ), EG's , panners - these
are SCREAMING for digital.
Imagine an envelope generator that could give you a standard
output, a synced ramp output a REVERSE output...all in realtime
and at the same time. You won't have to imagine this for too
long..because it's coming (that's a hint). Now try doing that with
analog.
As far as filters - I have to agree, analog rules. But this is not to
say a dsp filter couldn't be an interesting variant - like if you had
one amongst a slew of analog filters. It would be limiting
however if one only had digital's. As far as VCOs - computer
generated waveforms can be very accurate (perfect sine, that
sort of thing) and unquestionably stable...but IMHO, these two
parameters aren't the most critical. Frequency modulation is
and this is where digital VCOs fall short..very. Ever try to put a
chiff transcient on a digital VCO? In a word: eeeeeeew.
I think the best rule is to approach each situation independently.
It's foolish to avoid digita technology just for the sake of insisting
something be all analog, as if that's more legit, or divine, or as
you said, pure.. If digital can accomplish a certain task more
efficiently, more elegently, then do it. But one must not ingore the
shortcomings of both mediums - and that's when a good
engineer would show no prejeduces.
For instance - the Buchla 200e. If any engineer was handed a
written spec for that instrument with the assignment to design it -
99 out of 100 would approach it exactly the way Don Buchla did.
You can't do a 200e all analog - can't be done.
So each has it's place.
If the idea with plan b and livewire stuff is to create new and rare
old modules and tap into the musicians who are trying to make
new forms etc then some form of digital hybrid and weird alient
technology is maybe one way forward , not that the 'traditional ' :)
doesnt get us right out there , i am sure there is the
> potential in some digital usage to create modules that sound
cool , their not ' pure ' in essence but may sound very nice :) its
all in the ears and the potential it brings . . . .re-invent the wheel
and upset them oldies :) . . .however i have to respect the mind
melt of those old circuits . . . . thats what sold me on the Plan b
stuff . . . that and the chaos modules from livewire . . . .
>
> cheers
>
> matt
>
>
> "(i think you can figure that out)" <peter@...> wrote:
> MATT!
>
> Before i answer...have you voted for your preferred Model 18
> (that's really 18) format yet? ha ha.
>
> ANYWAY...no plans to do a wavetable as I have enough
goodies
> on the drawing board at Plan B Skunkworks to last
> me....hmm...10 years? Nah, not quite THAT long.
>
> close though.
>
> But seriously, I am currently working on six newbies in the "it's
> been designed, just have to to do the PCB layout" mode, two
> others in the "seriously in development' mode, and three
others
> tht are in whatever mode it's called when you're thinking about
> them as your driving.
>
> One that's in the serious development mode is the new Mitlon,
> and i happen to have another session with the programmer
this
> evening (it's a regular rain or shine Sunday evening thing for
the
> last couple of months). I bring this one up specifically because
> alos, it may still change formats (see next letter).
>
> Mike was talking about a bit -cruncher, we just need to needle
> him on his thinking that it's a sin to include digital circuits in an
> analog module! And you can tell'em i said that - ha ha !
>
> As far as a wavetable VCO - its come up in think tank
meetings,
> but it's not gotten any further than that.
>
> One I have been tossing around recently (car mode) is a
> harmonic generator of sorts - all analog. First ten harmonics
via
> sliders or VCs. Sine, saw and possibly square outs.
>
> - P
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "izimizam"
> <izimizam@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > is a wavetable osc planned still ? maybe with a few twists
> ;)ppg
> > waveset etc.Surprised no one has done a Ppg OSc module ,
> maybe the
> > current wavetatble osc are this .Also wondered if anyone will
> be doing
> > a noise generator digital noise type osc like the dark star
> chaos etc ?
> > or with that 8 bit sound .Always looking for new forms of
> strange
> > noise
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > matt
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Electronic payment Electronic test equipment Guitar
synthesizer Voice synthesizer Analogue Sampler
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "PLAN_B_analog_blog" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> PLAN_B_analog_blog-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the
all new Yahoo! Security Centre.
>