PLAN B analog blog

I'm mainly interested in hearing how 'snappy' the decay is when  
applied to the cutoff of a lowpass filter. Correct me if I'm wrong,  
but different filter designs will have different response times (e.g.  
a vactrol-based filter will be slower than a non-vactrol one, right?),  
so I realize that the 'snappiness' isn't necessarily due to the ADSR  
itself, however, it seems to me that not all ADSRs are made the same.  
In particular, I have heard both the Doepfer A-141 and the Cwejman  
ADSR-VC2 control the cutoff of the Cwejman MMF-1, and the VC2 appears  
to have a nicer, i.e. tighter/faster/snappier, decay than the A-141.  
I'm curious to know how the Model 38 compares with the VC2---not in  
terms of features but in terms of perceived speed.

Thanks for your response.

Matt

On 18-Aug-08, at 6:26 AM, Monroe Eskew wrote:

> Is there any particular application you want to hear?  It's a  
> standard ADSR... I don't really know what could distinguish its  
> sound significantly from others.
>
> On Aug 17, 2008, at 8:58 AM, celery5555 wrote:
>
>> I'm curious to hear the the model 38 in action. Does anyone have  
>> one of these yet? If so
>> would you mind posting a demo somewhere?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>
>