PLAN B analog blog

I would def be interested in something like this. Sounds like a better
 option than the doepfer DIY thing. $150 and then you can stick it in
an enclosed rack or build a wooden box around it - sounds like a good
deal to me. 

--- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you can figure
that out)" <peter@...> wrote:
>
> OK, there are ways and ways and here's something I need feedback on:
> 
> One of the biggest problems with EUro are the many many module widths.
>  Not a problem for the modules - the varied widths are a real plus in
> that regard.  The problem are the rails.  If you don't use a pre-fab'd
> IEEE standard railing system, such as Vector and a bunch of others
> provide then you are forced to have some sort of mounting surface
> manufactured that has that long row of 5.o8 mm spaced m4 holes.  
> 
> xtremely costly.
> 
> OK, let's make that easy and say we have to use one of these pre-made
> systems.  One way we could really cut costs if instead of having to
> buy a duplicate power system for each box, if a central power unit
> could be used to power multiple racks. There's one way.  SO the first
> rack with the central unit may cost a little more,  but the second or
> third unit would be much less expensive.
> 
> But there's another idea which would make it make it very affordable -
> having a open frame.  No box around, just rails with a single panel
> that holds the power bus.  It's got it's problems, but it's got some
> real benefits with it.  Assuming the rack will be mounted in a chassis
> that is enclosed, could this be a viable alternative?
> 
> By looking as my component counts on my modules you know I'm not one
> to cut back of circuitry unless it's functionally sound to do so.  But
> we're talking about single row mounting systems that wouldn't breach
> the $150 barrier.
> 
> Your thoughts are appreciated.
> 
> - P
>