Mellotronists group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Mellotronists

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:09 UTC

Thread

Zeppelin tron.

Zeppelin tron.

2003-03-31 by kinchmusic@aol.com

Does anyone know whether the machine in question was an EMI one? Only, when I discovered my beaten up machine rotting away in some basement in Kensington a few years ago, the seller reckoned it had spent its last working years at the country retreat of Jimmy Page. It certainly had been "well toured".- Coffee mug stains and cigarette marks a plenty. Plus there were 2 large stickers on the cabinet, one Gentle Giant, one LZ. However, the power supply was completely missing, so I assume it might have been cannibalised to fit another machine at some stage, or I guess it might have been taken out for repair and never done. It was in a most sorry state of repair, a real challenge to JB and MS who did a most stirling job. This raises the prickly question of whether to have the cabinet restored or not. I decided, rightly or wrongly to have it done due to the surface damage, but obviously this process wipes out at a stroke the visible history of the instrument. Any thoughts out there?
Andy K
EMI m400 #E4/1405
www.go to/andykinch

RE: [Mellotronists] Zeppelin tron.

2003-04-01 by Andy Thompson

-----Original Message-----
From: kinchmusic@... [mailto:kinchmusic@...]
Sent: 31 March 2003 20:57
To: Mellotronists@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Mellotronists] Zeppelin tron.

Does anyone know whether the machine in question was an EMI one? Only, when I discovered my beaten up machine rotting away in some basement in Kensington a few years ago, the seller reckoned it had spent its last working years at the country retreat of Jimmy Page.
The seller of my M400 reckoned it was 'ex-Crimson'. Yeah, right. Zep's M400, at least in '73, was a standard white one. To my knowledge, that's the machine used on the studio 'Rain Song' and 'Kashmir', although I believe 'Kashmir' was easier to perform with the MkV. Wasn't that the prototype one? Looks quite different to the production model.

Andy T.

M400 #1145

'The Ultimate Mellotron Recordings List (Possibly)'

http://freespace.virgin.net/andy.thompson/

Re: [Mellotronists] Zeppelin tron.

2003-04-02 by chris.dale@primus.ca

The M400 used by Led Zeppelin was a standard Streetly M400, serial number 216 I think.
There is a bootleg video of The Song Remains The Same where the unit can clearly be seen during a lacklustre performance of the Rain Song. The machine goes out of tune, and Pagey sulks through the entire piece.
Regarding mellotrons with handles - there is a picture in Crimson's "Great Deceiver" Box set where handles have been fitted to the sides of their M400. The machine is still white (no carpet or black paint).
Chris
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 11:49 AM
Subject: RE: [Mellotronists] Zeppelin tron.

-----Original Message-----
From: kinchmusic@... [mailto:kinchmusic@...]
Sent: 31 March 2003 20:57
To: Mellotronists@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Mellotronists] Zeppelin tron.

Does anyone know whether the machine in question was an EMI one? Only, when I discovered my beaten up machine rotting away in some basement in Kensington a few years ago, the seller reckoned it had spent its last working years at the country retreat of Jimmy Page.
The seller of my M400 reckoned it was 'ex-Crimson'. Yeah, right. Zep's M400, at least in '73, was a standard white one. To my knowledge, that's the machine used on the studio 'Rain Song' and 'Kashmir', although I believe 'Kashmir' was easier to perform with the MkV. Wasn't that the prototype one? Looks quite different to the production model.

Andy T.

M400 #1145

'The Ultimate Mellotron Recordings List (Possibly)'

http://freespace.virgin.net/andy.thompson/



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Mellotronists-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.