Don Tillman wrote: > > Hi David, > > That's fine; the Echoplex also runs at a constant motor speed. One of > the heads (I forget whether it's the record or playback head) is > physically mounted on a sliding track, and you manually move it back > and forth to change the delay time. > > You'd probably want to do something similar for a Mellotron tape echo. > > It's actually better to have the head on a slider -- you can yank it > and perform much faster speed changes than you could with the > rotational inertia of a motor. And if you move it fast enough you can > even run the echo sound backwards for brief bits. Witness the Tommy > Bolan guitar solo on Billy Cobham's "Spectrum". :-) -- Don ____________________________________________________________ Hi Don and gang, Interesting discussion about on-board tape-echo for Trons. Will wear my engineer's thinking-cap for a moment. Hides my "folically-challenged" cranium anyway. There's barely enough room to shoehorn a two-head (front-to-rear) assembly adjacent to the headblock assembly. Support electronics will have to tap into preamp box output and also add recording circuitry. Since all present Trons are playback-only, an old engineering cookbook might be the solution. The actual implementation of a 36th tape driven off the capstan in endless-loop config. would not be impossible. Too bad capstans aren't two inches longer on the LH side of M400's..... Cheers, -- Jerry Korb (no echoes, but repeats of Mexican cuisine)
Message
Re: [Mellotronists] Echoplex, you say?
2006-08-30 by Jerry Korb
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.