Hi Babz, As you've probably guessed I have MTron and I find it interesting and useful. I suppose I'm lucky to have a real tron too (M300) so I can use MTron as a second. I've never hear the Pinder CD which is the other main virtual tron so I can't compare the 2 although we've had this discussion many times on the list and I think the concensus is that the Pinderton cd is much better. But for the price! Some of the MTron sounds are a bit rough others okay. I particularly like the Chamberlin solo female voice - nice for Entangled together with the real tron 8-voice choir! I have to say the Birotron sounds are a pile of crap! John > > > On Wednesday, November 24, 2004, at 07:02 PM, MSB wrote: > > > ey do make a stand alone version of M-Tron, so you don't even need > > Cubase or V-Stack..."??? > > Because what I read on the GMedia website says, as I've stated > > earlier: "According to the GMedia M-Tron webpage, ".....the M-Tron VST > > plug-in requires a VST 2.0 compatible host application such as Cubase > > VST or Logic Audio to operate."" > > > > Could you perhaps direct me to the stand-alone so that I can further > > investigate??? I really appreciate, thanks!!! > > http://www.gmediamusic.com/gforce/m-tron/mtronfaq.html > > Yes, it is confusing, and you have to click around to find it. Like I > say, I haven't tried it yet. No stand alone version came in the box > when I bought it, but I later downloaded it; just haven't had time to > try it. > > BTW, GMedia also make an outstanding virtual Arp Odyssey too! > > BTW #2... I did once own a number of real vintage keyboard back in the > 70s, including a suitcase 73 Rhodes, Wurly 140B, Odyssey, and others, > but never a Mellotron. (I did once sit in with a prog band who had a > Mellotron and an Arp 2600.) I miss a lot about those old instruments, > but I don't miss all the maintenance, tuning, etc... I have no desire > to own a real tron. The virtual stuff is a lot of fun, and in some > ways better than the originals. > > I just got the Arturia Mini Moog, which is awesome! Sure, it's not > *exactly* like the original. But it also has a lot of advantages over > the original ... patch memory, polyphony, *MIDI*(!) .... > > In terms of the Tron, I appreciate the real thing, believe me, and all > the great music made with it. But I mainly joined this group hoping to > perhaps bump into other users of M-Tron, other other virtual tron > solutions. Any other M-Tron users out there? > > Best, > Babz > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
Message
Re: [Mellotronists] Re: M-Tron (was Re: HELP NEEDED..Related Question )
2004-11-25 by J.K.Beresford
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.