Yes, you feel exactly the same way most of us do here. Many of us have one or more of these aforementioned instruments, and for those of us who don't you'll find that we work *very* hard at making any samples sound authentic and true to the character of the original instrument. If we do anything differently it's with intent for both creativity and passion for musical expression. You'll also find a lot of us using decent recording equipment and accessories as well, so please bear with us if we get carried away, though I find you'll always learn something new even if we've beaten a topic to death. Regarding the chamberlins - are you sure about there being 100 Model 200's made? I would think there might be less than that as the 200 was a rather experimental beast made from 1951-59 I believe. I have 2 M1 models of which I know at least100 were made, their production run going from 1970 to around 1981, and even here there are minor differences in size and adjustment. I can guarantee you that many of these machines have been destroyed. I know of a fellow who was given a chamberlin in place of some money owed to him along with an ARP Omni. Since he knew the Omni could do string sounds he saw no need for the chamberlin and put it in the trash outside near his driveway. Then there's Rick Wakeman's "marsh - mellow" tron roast where he incinerated two machines in a rage on Guy Fawkes night. I've heard of sacrificial Optigan burnings as well, and an orchestron that became both a cigarette ashtray and a Keith Emerson style L100 replacement. Another thing besides oddball-ness/rarity that I find intriguing is that they all represent leaps forth in technology. The tape keyboards are basically the first samplers, and the disc based keyboards represent the first CD players. Makes you wonder what's next - maybe something just as odd, like holographic based instruments?!! Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Maxwell Hiller" <maxwellhiller@...> To: "Chris Dale" <chris.dale@...>; <mellotronists@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 6:21 PM Subject: Re: [Mellotronists] Re: Chamberlin 200 > Thank you Chris. I just think with this stuff that there were SO few of them made originally (apparently only about 100 Chamberlin 200's), that to let one die is to actually affect the "survival of the species" as a whole. It's not like with a roland or something. First of all, I think the average joe with a schematic and a soldering iron could build most roland keyboards. Mellotrons, Chamberlins and the like are much more obscure in their workings. PLus, I just have a hard time imagining a world where we were down to the last handful of known alpha juno synthesizers. When it comes to Chamberlins, or even Mellotrons, its so much different. I mean, I own 1% of the Chamberlin 200's in the world, and that's assuming that none of them have been destroyed. Yet look at the importance of the instrument. I'm rambling, but I would think that everyone on this list can feel the, and I know this sounds corny, but, the magic of playing such a wonderful and rare bird of an instrument as a mellotron or chamberlin. Can everyone tell that I'm kind of excited to have joined this group? > > Max > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Dale <chris.dale@...> > Sent: Dec 8, 2003 4:56 PM > To: maxwellhiller <maxwellhiller@...>, > Mellotronists <mellotronists@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: [Mellotronists] Re: Chamberlin 200 > > Hello Max: > > > Welcome to our group, and congratulations on your purchase. I must tell you > I was in a similar situation several years ago. > > I picked up a double manual mellotron that was in just the same if not worse > condition as the Ebay Chamberlin you bought. It was filled with dirt, mold, > mouse crap, rust, corrosion, was totally out of adjustment, came in several > pieces and in any sane man's view probably should have been left on it's > journey to the dumpster. It became a very questionable project to say the > least, and I struggled very much with that machine. I'm talking tears of > frustration! > > Nevertheless I renovated it (with help from some members of this list) to > pretty much original spec. and I can reassure you from personal experience > that with enough enthusiasm, time and effort, your machine will sing again. > > It's well worth the effort in my opinion to keep these wonderful machines > going. Mellotrons, Chamberlins, Optigans, Orchestrons etc all have a certain > indescribable charm to them and I don't think it's a waste of time restoring > them. > > > Good luck > > > Chris > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "maxwellhiller" <maxwellhiller@...> > To: <Mellotronists@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 4:56 PM > Subject: [Mellotronists] Re: Chamberlin 200 > > > > That would be the same beat to hell little chamberlin on ebay. You > > know, I figured it would be one of my only opportunities to have > > one. I shelled out $2500 for my M400, and that was probably the last > > time in a long time that I will be able to pay that much for an > > instrument, let alone the $6000 that I've seen other chamberlins go > > for. I happen to have an absolute genius of a tech, and I'm willing > > to take on some pretty wild stuff just for the hell of it (I live in > > chicago, grew up in minnesota, and know that a winter without a > > project is a hard winter). I will not only keep this group updated > > on my progress, I will probably be asking for some advice along the > > way. > > > > Max > > > > --- In Mellotronists@yahoogroups.com, "jonesalley" <jonesalley@s...> > > wrote: > > > So,would that be the forlorn little Chamberlin that just sold for > > > $370.00 on eBay? If so, it looks like you have acquired a pretty > > > ambitious project - I hope you can share the tales of the > > restoration > > > with us. > > > > > > Jon E Salley > > > M400 #886 > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > Mellotronists-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > Mellotronists-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [Mellotronists] Re: Chamberlin 200
2003-12-09 by Chris Dale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.