All this talk about recording techniques to get "that sound" is very interesting, but having listened closely to "Heaven" last night it seems to me a lot may also be due to how it's played musically. Kitcat isn't playing triads all the time - it's very open chords in places with octaves occasionally and different each time round. I find this makes a huge difference to the soundscape. John M300 #005 > After finally getting the chance to listen to the example clip, I > agree, that's THE SOUND. These guys did almost as nice a job as the > Moodies in capturing that distant hugeness. > > And, since I acquired mine, I've come to realize that what is making > that sound for me is a couple of things, and may not necessarily be > confined to a single amp/speaker/mic/medium combination, but could be > fairly repeatable under a lot of different circumstances. > > First, as I observed once before, one thing that I think makes > Mellotron instruments, with particular reference to the classic > 3-violins sound, so unique is that each 8-second strip of tape is a > complete world in itself. Three instruments in a certain physical > relationship to each other that is constantly moving and evolving, > developing all kinds of minute phase differences, all being shaped by > the sound of the room that they were being recorded in. > > Then put that sound in a BIG room and play it real loud with less than > hi-fi audio equipment, and add some artificial reverb to it that is > also less than hi-fi. > > That yields the original playback sound, the ambience it already > possesses, the artificial lo-fi reverb ambience, and the natural real > reverb and echo characteristics of said big room. > > Then record it all from a fairly good distance, preferably at least > twenty or thirty feet, if not more. > > The final piece of the puzzle is to tune the Mellotron down by 1-3 > cents or so, just enough to give it a little bit of melancholy > flatness in pitch. > > You get the three ambiences playing against each other, the distance, > the thickness of sound, the individuality of each strip of tape, and > that little bit of sad wistfulness that the flat intonation provides. > > You will find that the sound is much like the recording. Depending on > speakers, mics, and all the other twiddly bits of equipment, it will > flavor the sound to a certain degree, but you still get a big chunk of > that distant hugeness that we all seem to love so much. Play it loud. > > I'd also like to mention that another interesting trick I've found is > to play the part, re-tune the Mellotron up or down from a half step to > the full major third, and play the keyboard part again, transposing > the key pattern on the keyboard to play in pitch with the original > material. You now have 6,9,12, or 15-violins, because you are taking > NEW "samples" and adding them together, each one having totally > different ambience characteristics. If you are feeling ambitious, > play different lines with each tuning and ambience, and do multiple > passes to add in some of the small timing inconsistencies that a big > group of violinists will have. The sound can get just entirely too > huge, but if you want Mellotron that will part your hair, sandblast > your car, and scare children and animals, try it. > > That last trick is even pretty effective for huge Mellotron sounds > recorded straight to tape with different artificial reverbs on each > pass, but nothing comes out sounding quite like the loud Mellotron > recorded from a distance in the big room with the artificial reverb. > Smells like Wakeman in here... > > Jon E Salley > MiloJohnson@... > M400 #886 > > > www.tronsounds.com/songs/hvn.mp3 > > >
Message
Re: Fw: [Mellotronists] Calling All Ears - Trying to Get *That* Sound
2002-08-06 by J.K.Beresford
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.